Re: [PATCH] imx:mmdc:Move imx6-reg include to imx6-mmdc header

On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 09:11:09PM +0200, Christian Hemp wrote: > Move the imx6-reg.h include to the imx6-mmdc header. > > Signed-off-by: Christian Hemp Applied, thanks Sascha > --- > arch/arm/mach-imx/imx6-mmdc.c |1 - > arch/arm/mach-imx/include/mach/imx6-mmdc.h |1 + >

Re: [PATCH 1/3] tftp: add timeframe when remote server is retransmitting

Hi Christoph, On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:32:01AM +0200, chf.fr...@googlemail.com wrote: > From: Christoph Fritz > > If there's packet loss and the remote server needs to retransmit, > there is falsely no timeframe left because TIMEOUT (server wait time) > and TFTP_TIMEOUT (abort timer) are the s

Re: [PATCH 2/3] net cpsw: fix rx stability under heavy network load

On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:32:02AM +0200, chf.fr...@googlemail.com wrote: > From: Christoph Fritz > > RX DMA Head Descriptor Pointer can get 0 when there is a lot of traffic, > which results in a timeout error. A good way to provoke this error is by > sending lots of ARP requests. This patch make

Re: [PATCH 3/3] net cpsw: check phy status on send and receive

On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:32:03AM +0200, chf.fr...@googlemail.com wrote: > From: Christoph Fritz > > This patch adds phy status checks on cpsw_send() and cpsw_recv(). > This is derived from upstream. What's the motivation for this? We already call phy_update_status every 5 seconds which then ca

Re: [PATCH] make: dts: fix out-of-tree build

Hi Silvio, On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 07:49:34AM +0200, Silvio Fricke wrote: > If barebox is builded out-of-tree we don't find the dts-include > > This patch prevent us to get this: > /[...]/barebox/drivers/input/keymap.c:4:37: fatal error: > dt-bindings/input/input.h: No such file or directory >

Re: [PATCH] Add Linux dts files and use them

Some updates how I intend to handle upstream dts changes in barebox. - I will merge the latest upstream dts changes to barebox for each Linux rc. Should dts changes introduce regressions this will at least give us the Linux rc which introduced it - I will always merge dts updates to barebox ne

Re: [PATCH 3/3] net cpsw: check phy status on send and receive

On Mon, 2014-05-05 at 09:22 +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:32:03AM +0200, chf.fr...@googlemail.com wrote: > > From: Christoph Fritz > > > > This patch adds phy status checks on cpsw_send() and cpsw_recv(). > > This is derived from upstream. > > What's the motivation for

v2014.05.0

Hi All, We have a new release for May. Some interesting things have happened since the last release: - We have initial support for TI DaVinci SoCs - MIPS Atheros ar933x are now supported - We have AT91 sama5d36 support - A 'menutree' command has been introduced to create a menu from a directory

TODO: Rewrite network stack.

Hi! I have inspected TODO file from barebox repo. Here is a quote: [ ] Rewrite network stack. The one-loop-for-all-protocols stack is just too ugly and big and uses thousands of global variables. Identify common functions and make a loop per network protocol There is no much tiny T

Re: New driver crashes with "unable to handle paging request"

Hi Christoph, > Christoph Fritz hat am 2. Mai 2014 um 00:50 > geschrieben: > > > Hi Rolf, > > I have ported musb (host-support) from u-boot to barebox. I'll send a > patchset in the next days. > that sounds very good. Thank you very much in advance! _

Re: TODO: Rewrite network stack.

> The most notable is lwIP (http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/lwip/). I'm not happy at all about this code base, it looks quite ugly and old-fashioned. It's not the barebox kind of quality. I'd stay with the current code rather than lwip, despite the number of users. If any, I'd evaluate picotc

Re: TODO: Rewrite network stack.

On Mon, 5 May 2014 14:29:44 +0200 Alessandro Rubini wrote: > > The most notable is lwIP (http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/lwip/). > > I'm not happy at all about this code base, it looks quite ugly and > old-fashioned. It's not the barebox kind of quality. I'd stay with the > current code rath

Re: TODO: Rewrite network stack.

On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 02:55:12PM +0400, Antony Pavlov wrote: > Hi! > > I have inspected TODO file from barebox repo. Here is a quote: > > [ ] Rewrite network stack. The one-loop-for-all-protocols stack is just too > ugly and big and uses thousands of global variables. Identify common >

Re: [PATCH] Add Linux dts files and use them

Mon, 5 May 2014 10:20:49 +0200 от Sascha Hauer : > Some updates how I intend to handle upstream dts changes in barebox. > > - I will merge the latest upstream dts changes to barebox for each Linux > rc. Should dts changes introduce regressions this will at least give us > the Linux rc which in

boot command is broken?

Hi, after update to v2014.05.0 'boot -l' displays only one entry, although in /env/boot/ exists more files. Can anyone confirm this? Best regards, Wjatscheslaw Stoljarski ___ barebox mailing list barebox@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/m

Re: [PATCH] Add Linux dts files and use them

On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 07:57:48PM +0400, Alexander Shiyan wrote: > Mon, 5 May 2014 10:20:49 +0200 от Sascha Hauer : > > Some updates how I intend to handle upstream dts changes in barebox. > > > > - I will merge the latest upstream dts changes to barebox for each Linux > > rc. Should dts change

Re: [PATCH] Add Linux dts files and use them

Mon, 5 May 2014 19:48:16 +0200 от Sascha Hauer : > On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 07:57:48PM +0400, Alexander Shiyan wrote: > > Mon, 5 May 2014 10:20:49 +0200 от Sascha Hauer : > > > Some updates how I intend to handle upstream dts changes in barebox. > > > > > > - I will merge the latest upstream dts ch

Re: boot command is broken?

On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 06:23:15PM +0200, Wjatscheslaw Stoljarski (Slawa) wrote: > Hi, > > after update to v2014.05.0 'boot -l' displays only one entry, although > in /env/boot/ exists more files. Can anyone confirm this? Unfortunately I can confirm this :( I'll have a look. Sascha -- Pengutr