On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 09:11:09PM +0200, Christian Hemp wrote:
> Move the imx6-reg.h include to the imx6-mmdc header.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Hemp
Applied, thanks
Sascha
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-imx/imx6-mmdc.c |1 -
> arch/arm/mach-imx/include/mach/imx6-mmdc.h |1 +
>
Hi Christoph,
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:32:01AM +0200, chf.fr...@googlemail.com wrote:
> From: Christoph Fritz
>
> If there's packet loss and the remote server needs to retransmit,
> there is falsely no timeframe left because TIMEOUT (server wait time)
> and TFTP_TIMEOUT (abort timer) are the s
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:32:02AM +0200, chf.fr...@googlemail.com wrote:
> From: Christoph Fritz
>
> RX DMA Head Descriptor Pointer can get 0 when there is a lot of traffic,
> which results in a timeout error. A good way to provoke this error is by
> sending lots of ARP requests. This patch make
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:32:03AM +0200, chf.fr...@googlemail.com wrote:
> From: Christoph Fritz
>
> This patch adds phy status checks on cpsw_send() and cpsw_recv().
> This is derived from upstream.
What's the motivation for this? We already call phy_update_status every
5 seconds which then ca
Hi Silvio,
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 07:49:34AM +0200, Silvio Fricke wrote:
> If barebox is builded out-of-tree we don't find the dts-include
>
> This patch prevent us to get this:
> /[...]/barebox/drivers/input/keymap.c:4:37: fatal error:
> dt-bindings/input/input.h: No such file or directory
>
Some updates how I intend to handle upstream dts changes in barebox.
- I will merge the latest upstream dts changes to barebox for each Linux
rc. Should dts changes introduce regressions this will at least give us
the Linux rc which introduced it
- I will always merge dts updates to barebox ne
On Mon, 2014-05-05 at 09:22 +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:32:03AM +0200, chf.fr...@googlemail.com wrote:
> > From: Christoph Fritz
> >
> > This patch adds phy status checks on cpsw_send() and cpsw_recv().
> > This is derived from upstream.
>
> What's the motivation for
Hi All,
We have a new release for May. Some interesting things have happened
since the last release:
- We have initial support for TI DaVinci SoCs
- MIPS Atheros ar933x are now supported
- We have AT91 sama5d36 support
- A 'menutree' command has been introduced to create a menu
from a directory
Hi!
I have inspected TODO file from barebox repo. Here is a quote:
[ ] Rewrite network stack. The one-loop-for-all-protocols stack is just too
ugly and big and uses thousands of global variables. Identify common
functions and make a loop per network protocol
There is no much tiny T
Hi Christoph,
> Christoph Fritz hat am 2. Mai 2014 um 00:50
> geschrieben:
>
>
> Hi Rolf,
>
> I have ported musb (host-support) from u-boot to barebox. I'll send a
> patchset in the next days.
>
that sounds very good. Thank you very much in advance!
_
> The most notable is lwIP (http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/lwip/).
I'm not happy at all about this code base, it looks quite ugly and
old-fashioned. It's not the barebox kind of quality. I'd stay with the
current code rather than lwip, despite the number of users.
If any, I'd evaluate picotc
On Mon, 5 May 2014 14:29:44 +0200
Alessandro Rubini wrote:
> > The most notable is lwIP (http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/lwip/).
>
> I'm not happy at all about this code base, it looks quite ugly and
> old-fashioned. It's not the barebox kind of quality. I'd stay with the
> current code rath
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 02:55:12PM +0400, Antony Pavlov wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have inspected TODO file from barebox repo. Here is a quote:
>
> [ ] Rewrite network stack. The one-loop-for-all-protocols stack is just too
> ugly and big and uses thousands of global variables. Identify common
>
Mon, 5 May 2014 10:20:49 +0200 от Sascha Hauer :
> Some updates how I intend to handle upstream dts changes in barebox.
>
> - I will merge the latest upstream dts changes to barebox for each Linux
> rc. Should dts changes introduce regressions this will at least give us
> the Linux rc which in
Hi,
after update to v2014.05.0 'boot -l' displays only one entry, although
in /env/boot/ exists more files. Can anyone confirm this?
Best regards,
Wjatscheslaw Stoljarski
___
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/m
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 07:57:48PM +0400, Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> Mon, 5 May 2014 10:20:49 +0200 от Sascha Hauer :
> > Some updates how I intend to handle upstream dts changes in barebox.
> >
> > - I will merge the latest upstream dts changes to barebox for each Linux
> > rc. Should dts change
Mon, 5 May 2014 19:48:16 +0200 от Sascha Hauer :
> On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 07:57:48PM +0400, Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> > Mon, 5 May 2014 10:20:49 +0200 от Sascha Hauer :
> > > Some updates how I intend to handle upstream dts changes in barebox.
> > >
> > > - I will merge the latest upstream dts ch
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 06:23:15PM +0200, Wjatscheslaw Stoljarski (Slawa) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after update to v2014.05.0 'boot -l' displays only one entry, although
> in /env/boot/ exists more files. Can anyone confirm this?
Unfortunately I can confirm this :(
I'll have a look.
Sascha
--
Pengutr
18 matches
Mail list logo