Hi,
As I'm working on a emulated CFI flash device for or1ksim (Openrisc
simulator) I choose to implement a CFI flash with a 8 bits data bus
connected to a 8 bits host bus.
As far as I can see, barebox cfi flash driver is broken for 8 bits devices.
Am I wrong ?
Anyone as ever used a 8 bits CFI c
---
include/linux/usb/musb.h | 162 --
include/usb/musb.h | 162 ++
2 files changed, 162 insertions(+), 162 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 include/linux/usb/musb.h
create mode 100644 include/usb/musb
---
drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c | 51 +-
drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.h | 10 -
drivers/usb/musb/musb_dsps.c | 41 +
drivers/usb/musb/musb_host.c | 31 +
drivers/usb/musb/musb_host.h |
Signed-off-by: Christoph Fritz
---
arch/arm/mach-omap/am33xx_mux.c | 24
arch/arm/mach-omap/include/mach/am33xx-mux.h |2 ++
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap/am33xx_mux.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap/am33xx_mux.c
index 8318713.
---
include/usb/usb.h | 62 +
1 file changed, 62 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/usb/usb.h b/include/usb/usb.h
index 1a369d2..6e204b4 100644
--- a/include/usb/usb.h
+++ b/include/usb/usb.h
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
#include
#include
#include
Signed-off-by: Christoph Fritz
---
include/linux/barebox-wrapper.h |2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/barebox-wrapper.h b/include/linux/barebox-wrapper.h
index 753fb52..4b5ea10 100644
--- a/include/linux/barebox-wrapper.h
+++ b/include/linux/barebox-wrapper.h
@
---
drivers/usb/Kconfig |2 ++
drivers/usb/Makefile |1 +
drivers/usb/musb/Kconfig | 21 +
drivers/usb/musb/Makefile |5 -
4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/usb/musb/Kconfig
diff --git a/drivers/usb/Kcon
Signed-off-by: Christoph Fritz
---
arch/arm/mach-omap/am33xx_clock.c |7 +++
arch/arm/mach-omap/include/mach/am33xx-clock.h |2 ++
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap/am33xx_clock.c
b/arch/arm/mach-omap/am33xx_clock.c
index 9105ddc..f4b1f4e
This RFC patchset is intended as a start or reference to get musb support
mainline. So mostly there is no Signed-off-by. This patchset applies to
current barebox and is tested on phytec-phycore-am335x.
If due to mail size restrictions a patch doesn't get through to this
mailinglist, the full patc
---
arch/arm/configs/am335x_defconfig |2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/am335x_defconfig
b/arch/arm/configs/am335x_defconfig
index 0c92c96..a9bf5e0 100644
--- a/arch/arm/configs/am335x_defconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/configs/am335x_defconfig
@@ -96,6 +96,8 @@ CONF
---
drivers/usb/musb/Makefile |2 +-
drivers/usb/musb/musb_barebox.c | 306 +++
2 files changed, 307 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/usb/musb/musb_barebox.c
diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/Makefile b/drivers/usb/musb/Makefile
i
---
arch/arm/mach-omap/Makefile |2 +-
arch/arm/mach-omap/am33xx_usb.c | 65 ++
arch/arm/mach-omap/include/mach/am33xx-usb.h | 11 +
3 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-omap/am33xx_usb.
---
arch/arm/mach-omap/include/mach/am33xx-silicon.h | 10 ++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap/include/mach/am33xx-silicon.h
b/arch/arm/mach-omap/include/mach/am33xx-silicon.h
index 20b8e81..bccae89 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap/include/mach/am33xx-sil
---
drivers/usb/musb/linux-compat.h | 31 +---
drivers/usb/musb/musb.h | 164 +++
drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c| 20 +++--
drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.h| 42 +++---
drivers/usb/musb/musb_dsps.c|2 -
drivers/usb/musb/musb_host
---
arch/arm/boards/phytec-phycore-am335x/board.c |6 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boards/phytec-phycore-am335x/board.c
b/arch/arm/boards/phytec-phycore-am335x/board.c
index 70b5db6..305c71b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boards/phytec-phycore-am335x/board.c
+++ b/arch
This patch enables usb high-speed power. To support full-speed or low-speed
devices, this patch needs to be reverted.
---
drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c |5 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c
index 6dbf1c
---
arch/arm/boards/phytec-phycore-am335x/board.c | 10 ++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boards/phytec-phycore-am335x/board.c
b/arch/arm/boards/phytec-phycore-am335x/board.c
index 9482b80..70b5db6 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boards/phytec-phycore-am335x/board.c
+++ b
Hi,
I'm testing with a custom board. I have just with the applied test and
it's working ! I can use 8k page nand with atmel_nand driver.
Do I have to wait until Matteo's patches are applied or can I submit
mine right now ?
Best regards,
Raphaël Poggi
2014-06-13 3:26 GMT+02:00 Bo Shen :
> Hi Rap
Hi all,
glad you found my patch useful. Sascha rejected it because he sees it
more fit to separate the initialization of sama5d3 and sam9 since they
are quite different.
I started, as advised by Sascha, to create into sam9_smc.c the function
void sama5d3_smc_configure(int id, int cs, struct s
Hi Sascha,
Thanks for the quick response! I tried imx_v7_defconfig but it seemed
to be as ill-suited for what I am trying to do as
freescale-mx6-sabresd_defconfig.
What I am trying to get is an ELF file that I would be able to use
with DS-5 debugger by uploading it directly into RAM and also an im
2014-06-13 9:24 GMT+02:00 Franck Jullien :
> Hi,
>
> As I'm working on a emulated CFI flash device for or1ksim (Openrisc
> simulator) I choose to implement a CFI flash with a 8 bits data bus
> connected to a 8 bits host bus.
>
> As far as I can see, barebox cfi flash driver is broken for 8 bits dev
Hi Andrey,
probably no one noticed because CONFIG_ARCH_TEXT_BASE is unused as
soon as CONFIG_RELOCATABLE is set.
However, I guess that you don't like a relocatable image to be used
with your debugger. Maybe you shrink barebox down to what you need and
put it into the static on-board SDRAM?
_
Yeah, that's what I've been doing(I forgot to mention that I disabled
relocatable image as well).
I just wanted to double check that I wasn't missing anything obvious
and that that setting was indeed incorrect.
Thanks,
Andrey
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Holger Schurig
wrote:
> Hi Andrey,
23 matches
Mail list logo