On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 02:40:08PM +0200, Alexander Aring wrote:
Hi,
I resend this mail. My last one was malformed, because I tried to
answert this mail via smartphone while boring lecture at university.
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 08:56:15AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 03:52:16PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
Sascha,
unfortunately, your dev_request_mem_region fixup introduced a typo
(map_base instead of mpp_base). I took the chance to also add a
corresponding check for dove's pinctrl stub.
Please squash into commmit
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 09:18:18AM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote:
From: Lucas Stach l.st...@pengutronix.de
Header only implementation, so they can be pulled
into the individual SoC cpu init functions.
Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach l.st...@pengutronix.de
Applied, thanks
Sascha
---
gcc-4.9 is too silly to recognize that *jump cannot be used
uninitialized and issues a warning. Explicitly initialize
*jump to avoid the warning.
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer s.ha...@pengutronix.de
---
scripts/kconfig/menu.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
On 06/26/2014 06:27 AM, Alexander Aring wrote:
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 11:50:56PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
On 06/22/2014 10:34 PM, Alexander Aring wrote:
This patch add a basic support for the D-Link DNS-325.
Currently only booting via uart with kwboot is supported. The barebox
The functions are already in the sandbox, just the #defines are
missing.
Signed-off-by: Holger Schurig holgerschu...@gmail.com
---
arch/sandbox/include/asm/bitops.h |7 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/sandbox/include/asm/bitops.h
... and it's defined only when CONFIG_OFTREE_MEM_GENERIC is on.
Signed-off-by: Holger Schurig holgerschu...@gmail.com
---
drivers/of/base.c |6 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
index c440a69..818d76e 100644
--- a/drivers/of/base.c
+++
Compiling the tree with allyesconfig is helpful because different
compilers (gcc, clang) or static checkers (e.g. clang's scan-build)
can then process and check more code.
This patch introduces two new configuration symbols that Kconfig files
can depend on. That way, code that is only working
When compiled for ARCH=sandbox, we get a compiler warning
if we don't include the needed header file as well.
Signed-off-by: Holger Schurig holgerschu...@gmail.com
---
commands/linux_exec.c |1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/commands/linux_exec.c b/commands/linux_exec.c
index
I want to use different compilers and static checkers (e.g. clang's
scan-build) on Barebox. As a preparatory step I want to maximize code
coverage in an non-crosscompilation environment.
This patch set prepares the tree so that make ARCH=sandbox allyesconfig
followed by make ARCH=sandbox works
This removes the documentation texts in Documentation/. It will
be replaced with sphinx based documentation later.
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer s.ha...@pengutronix.de
---
Documentation/console.txt | 13
Documentation/devices_drivers.txt | 72 --
From: Jan Luebbe j...@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jan Luebbe j...@pengutronix.de
---
commands/automount.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/commands/automount.c b/commands/automount.c
index 0afe4d2..a29f286 100644
--- a/commands/automount.c
+++
From: Jan Luebbe j...@pengutronix.de
To simplify parsing of the help strings, we need to avoid using
macros there.
Signed-off-by: Jan Luebbe j...@pengutronix.de
---
commands/ubiformat.c | 10 +-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/commands/ubiformat.c
Remove the barebox devicetree documentation. It will
be replaced with sphinx based documentation later.
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer s.ha...@pengutronix.de
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/README | 6 --
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/barebox.txt | 10 -
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer s.ha...@pengutronix.de
---
commands/partition.c | 16 +---
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/commands/partition.c b/commands/partition.c
index 946cf2d..51988df 100644
--- a/commands/partition.c
+++ b/commands/partition.c
@@
Hi all,
I am happy to announce new documentation for barebox.
The following series removes the in-tree documentation and replaces
it with completely rewritten sphinxs based documentation. As of now
we have a more or less complete user manual. There surely is room
for improvements but we think
to NULL
- Alex
[0] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-kbuild/msg08898.html
[1]
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/scripts/kconfig/menu.c?id=refs/tags/next-20140626
___
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
Hi,
nice !
I merged remotes/origin/doc into my local checkout of
remotes/origin/next and did make docs. I got one warning:
schurig@laptop:~/d/mkarm/barebox$ make docs
Making output directory...
Running Sphinx v1.1.2
loading pickled environment... not yet created
building [html]: targets for
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 11:02:56AM +0200, Holger Schurig wrote:
Hi,
nice !
I merged remotes/origin/doc into my local checkout of
remotes/origin/next and did make docs. I got one warning:
schurig@laptop:~/d/mkarm/barebox$ make docs
Making output directory...
Running Sphinx v1.1.2
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 08:53:02AM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
On 06/26/2014 06:27 AM, Alexander Aring wrote:
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 11:50:56PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
On 06/22/2014 10:34 PM, Alexander Aring wrote:
This patch add a basic support for the D-Link
Some random annotations. Please comment, after feedback I'll provide a
bunch of patches for this. I don't do the patches right away, because
you may still work currently in that area, so it would only produce
conflicts.
User manuel 2. System setup should be in an appendix. Nothing here
is really
Hi Holger,
can you please check if this is also a solution for this?
diff --git a/include/of.h b/include/of.h
index e6993fd..76845e7 100644
--- a/include/of.h
+++ b/include/of.h
@@ -227,7 +227,14 @@ int of_parse_partitions(struct cdev *cdev, struct
device_node *node);
int
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 11:37:01AM +0200, Alexander Aring wrote:
Hi Holger,
can you please check if this is also a solution for this?
diff --git a/include/of.h b/include/of.h
index e6993fd..76845e7 100644
--- a/include/of.h
+++ b/include/of.h
@@ -227,7 +227,14 @@ int
Your patch alone isn't all that's needed, the definition must still be
uncommented. Otherwise we'll get:
drivers/of/base.c:1700:5: error: redefinition of 'of_add_memory'
include/of.h:233:50: note: previous definition of 'of_add_memory' was here
___
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 11:37:01AM +0200, Alexander Aring wrote:
Hi Holger,
can you please check if this is also a solution for this?
diff --git a/include/of.h b/include/of.h
index e6993fd..76845e7 100644
--- a/include/of.h
+++ b/include/of.h
@@ -227,7 +227,14 @@ int
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 11:43:10AM +0200, Holger Schurig wrote:
Your patch alone isn't all that's needed, the definition must still be
uncommented. Otherwise we'll get:
drivers/of/base.c:1700:5: error: redefinition of 'of_add_memory'
include/of.h:233:50: note: previous definition of
Oh, and I just noticed that two chapters Getting barebox are contained:
1. Getting barebox
3.1. Getting barebox
I'd also think that long-term the user manual thingy inside the
documention could vanish. Everything could/should/is the user manual,
or?
Am Donnerstag, den 26.06.2014, 11:54 +0200 schrieb Holger Schurig:
Oh, and I just noticed that two chapters Getting barebox are contained:
1. Getting barebox
3.1. Getting barebox
I'd also think that long-term the user manual thingy inside the
documention could vanish. Everything
Hi all,
In the Freescale i.MX6Q Reference manual they say in 8. System Boot
near the end of 8.5.3.1 Expansion Device eFUSE configuration that
the processor can load from SDCARD, but only up to 32 MB.
Did any one of you succeeded in booting barebox from SDCARD, maybe
with a trampoline code? Or
No, we would like to clearly separate user docs
But still it is unfortunate that two Getting Barebox chapters are
there at all, and that they are very near to each.
Also, I think that (necessarily!) the design desicions are now mostly
in the user manual, e.g. device parameters. In the
Am Donnerstag, den 26.06.2014, 12:04 +0200 schrieb Holger Schurig:
Hi all,
In the Freescale i.MX6Q Reference manual they say in 8. System Boot
near the end of 8.5.3.1 Expansion Device eFUSE configuration that
the processor can load from SDCARD, but only up to 32 MB.
Did any one of you
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 10:51:31 +0200
Sascha Hauer s.ha...@pengutronix.de wrote:
Hi all,
I am happy to announce new documentation for barebox.
Ag!
All my mips documentation have gone away!
I'm ready to convert old dox-files to new rst-files by myself,
but I need some recomendations.
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014, Sascha Hauer wrote:
Hi all,
I am happy to announce new documentation for barebox.
The following series removes the in-tree documentation and replaces
it with completely rewritten sphinxs based documentation. As of now
we have a more or less complete user manual. There
Hmm, I have removed the imx6_init_lowlevel() from my (out-of-tree)
board.c file. Still I get this warning:
__request_region: 0x1000:0x4fff conflicts with 0x1000:0x4fff
Could this be related to your patchset? In the log below, the text
ahs2_postcore_init, after
On 06/25/2014 09:27 PM, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
On 06/25/2014 09:18 PM, Jason Cooper wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 04:08:44PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
This *RFC* adds a driver stub for ChipIdea USB dual role controllers
found on Marvell MVEBU SoCs. Although, I consider this
For some phyFLEX-i.MX6 modules the call __barebox_arm_head() was not removed.
With this function the barebox does not start.
Signed-off-by: Christian Hemp christian.h...@gmail.com
---
arch/arm/boards/phytec-phyflex-imx6/lowlevel.c |6 --
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
diff --git
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 04:09:17PM +0200, Christian Hemp wrote:
For some phyFLEX-i.MX6 modules the call __barebox_arm_head() was not removed.
With this function the barebox does not start.
Signed-off-by: Christian Hemp christian.h...@gmail.com
---
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 07:56:58AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 02:40:08PM +0200, Alexander Aring wrote:
Hi,
I resend this mail. My last one was malformed, because I tried to
answert this mail via smartphone while boring lecture at university.
On Wed, Jun
being the pedant that i am, i notice the following widespread
misspellings in the barebox codebase:
* existance (should be existence)
actually, not that widespread, only three, all comments so easy to
fix
* persistant (should be persistent)
this one is much uglier -- a couple dozen,
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 06:31:10AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014, Sascha Hauer wrote:
... snip ...
couple quick observations before i put on my editor hat and go
through all this. first, on my fedora rawhide system, running make
docs generates quite a few
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 02:28:21PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
being the pedant that i am, i notice the following widespread
misspellings in the barebox codebase:
* existance (should be existence)
actually, not that widespread, only three, all comments so easy to
fix
*
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 10:49:17AM +0200, Holger Schurig wrote:
Compiling the tree with allyesconfig is helpful because different
compilers (gcc, clang) or static checkers (e.g. clang's scan-build)
can then process and check more code.
This patch introduces two new configuration symbols that
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 10:49:14AM +0200, Holger Schurig wrote:
When compiled for ARCH=sandbox, we get a compiler warning
if we don't include the needed header file as well.
Signed-off-by: Holger Schurig holgerschu...@gmail.com
Applied this one, thanks
SAscha
---
commands/linux_exec.c |
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 10:49:16AM +0200, Holger Schurig wrote:
The functions are already in the sandbox, just the #defines are
missing.
Signed-off-by: Holger Schurig holgerschu...@gmail.com
Applied this one, thanks
Sascha
---
arch/sandbox/include/asm/bitops.h |7 +++
1 file
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 04:09:17PM +0200, Christian Hemp wrote:
For some phyFLEX-i.MX6 modules the call __barebox_arm_head() was not removed.
With this function the barebox does not start.
Signed-off-by: Christian Hemp christian.h...@gmail.com
Applied, thanks (and fixed the whitespaces while
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 12:11:30PM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 26.06.2014, 12:04 +0200 schrieb Holger Schurig:
Hi all,
In the Freescale i.MX6Q Reference manual they say in 8. System Boot
near the end of 8.5.3.1 Expansion Device eFUSE configuration that
the processor
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 10:49:15AM +0200, Holger Schurig wrote:
... and it's defined only when CONFIG_OFTREE_MEM_GENERIC is on.
Signed-off-by: Holger Schurig holgerschu...@gmail.com
---
drivers/of/base.c |6 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 02:02:07PM +0200, Holger Schurig wrote:
Hmm, I have removed the imx6_init_lowlevel() from my (out-of-tree)
board.c file. Still I get this warning:
__request_region: 0x1000:0x4fff conflicts with 0x1000:0x4fff
Could this be related to your patchset?
Dear list,
I am working on TI's AM335x SoCs and want to add support for the missing
NAND controller features in the driver. As the NAND interface of the
barebox is not in sync with the kernel, it is difficult for me to decide
which way to go. Is there already work going on to update the barebox
From 1edc77c7b960d5b42ac3c03000ac5063018195f9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Owen Kirby o...@exegin.com
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 13:40:06 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Support for booting ELF images.
This patch adds a bootelf command to load and execute OS kernels from the ELF
format.
Signed-off-by:
in the file Documentation/devices_drivers.txt, one reads:
See Documentation/parameters.txt for more info.
is this file supposed to exist?
rday
--
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario,
the Doc file timekeeping.txt refers to the file
cpu/arm920t/imx/interrupts.c. what is this supposed to point at?
rday
--
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 14:11:32 -0700
Owen Kirby o...@exegin.com wrote:
Have you seen the '[RFC 00/10] MIPS: use kexec to load ELF linux images' series?
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/barebox/2014-April/018651.html
This series is kexec-based so it has relocator.
The relocator make it
Signed-off-by: Antony Pavlov antonynpav...@gmail.com
---
arch/mips/configs/ritmix-rzx50_defconfig | 28 +++-
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/mips/configs/ritmix-rzx50_defconfig
b/arch/mips/configs/ritmix-rzx50_defconfig
index
Signed-off-by: Antony Pavlov antonynpav...@gmail.com
---
drivers/gpio/Kconfig | 6 ++
drivers/gpio/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/gpio/gpio-jz4740.c | 140 +
3 files changed, 147 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
Signed-off-by: Antony Pavlov antonynpav...@gmail.com
---
arch/mips/Kconfig | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/mips/Kconfig b/arch/mips/Kconfig
index 077586c..d4e9e1c 100644
--- a/arch/mips/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/mips/Kconfig
@@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ config MACH_MIPS_XBURST
Antony Pavlov (4):
gpio: add jz4740-gpio driver for Ingenic MIPS SoCs
MIPS: XBurst: use gpiolib
MIPS: dts: jz4755.dtsi: add gpio
MIPS: ritmix-rzx50_defconfig: enable gpio stuff
arch/mips/Kconfig| 1 +
arch/mips/configs/ritmix-rzx50_defconfig | 28 ---
Signed-off-by: Antony Pavlov antonynpav...@gmail.com
---
arch/mips/dts/jz4755.dtsi | 42 ++
1 file changed, 42 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/mips/dts/jz4755.dtsi b/arch/mips/dts/jz4755.dtsi
index 44ff912..0e655b6 100644
--- a/arch/mips/dts/jz4755.dtsi
I had not seen that patch series. It doesn't seem to have been checked
in, are you still working on it? kexec seems like a really fancy method
of loading the images, but it seems like quite a large patch set just
to support another image format. I guess this means that kexec would
need to be
Robert,
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 05:27:03PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
in the file Documentation/devices_drivers.txt, one reads:
See Documentation/parameters.txt for more info.
is this file supposed to exist?
Please don't waste your time with the old documentation. The new docs
are
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 16:09:35 -0700
Owen Kirby o...@exegin.com wrote:
I had not seen that patch series. It doesn't seem to have been checked
in, are you still working on it? kexec seems like a really fancy method
Yes, my kexec series have not been checked in.
I can fix it this weekend.
The
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 14:11:32 -0700
Owen Kirby o...@exegin.com wrote:
Here are some ELF-unrelated comments on your patch:
1. please use 'git send-email' for sending patches;
2. please use scripts/checkpatch.pl on your patches before sending them to
maillist;
My checkpatch.pl reports about
62 matches
Mail list logo
