Re: [PATCH 32/45] usb: ohci-at91: Check result of clk_get()

2017-03-07 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 01:21:40PM -0800, Andrey Smirnov wrote: > On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 8:35 AM, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 02:53:43PM -0800, Andrey Smirnov wrote: > >> Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov > >> --- > >>

Re: [PATCH 00/45] AT91, at91sam9x5ek updates

2017-03-07 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
> On Mar 8, 2017, at 5:18 AM, Andrey Smirnov wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Sam Ravnborg wrote: When booting from an SD-Card/NOR-Flash/USB would I then need to use at91bootstrap, or can I use only barebox? If

Re: [PATCH 32/45] usb: ohci-at91: Check result of clk_get()

2017-03-07 Thread Andrey Smirnov
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 8:35 AM, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 02:53:43PM -0800, Andrey Smirnov wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov >> --- >> drivers/usb/host/ohci-at91.c | 9 + >> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) >> >> diff

Re: [PATCH 00/45] AT91, at91sam9x5ek updates

2017-03-07 Thread Andrey Smirnov
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Sam Ravnborg wrote: >> > >> > When booting from an SD-Card/NOR-Flash/USB would I then need >> > to use at91bootstrap, or can I use only barebox? >> > >> > If I move forward with this and I can find an 9263 >> > evaluation kit I would then also

Re: [PATCH 00/45] AT91, at91sam9x5ek updates

2017-03-07 Thread Sam Ravnborg
> > > > When booting from an SD-Card/NOR-Flash/USB would I then need > > to use at91bootstrap, or can I use only barebox? > > > > If I move forward with this and I can find an 9263 > > evaluation kit I would then also update this. > On 9263 the sram is huge so you can build barebox as first

Re: [PATCH 00/45] AT91, at91sam9x5ek updates

2017-03-07 Thread Andrey Smirnov
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 12:13 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote: > Hi Andrey, > > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 02:53:11PM -0800, Andrey Smirnov wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> I recently had a chance to work with at91sam9x5ek board and as a part >> of that effort I converted the code to

Re: [PATCH 00/45] AT91, at91sam9x5ek updates

2017-03-07 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
> On Mar 8, 2017, at 12:34 AM, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > Hi Andrey. > > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 02:53:11PM -0800, Andrey Smirnov wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> I recently had a chance to work with at91sam9x5ek board and as a part >> of that effort I converted the code to

Re: [PATCH 35/45] usb: ohci-at91: Add DT support

2017-03-07 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 02:53:46PM -0800, Andrey Smirnov wrote: > Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov > --- > arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/board.h | 6 ++- > drivers/usb/host/ohci-at91.c| 84 > - > 2 files changed, 86

Re: [PATCH 32/45] usb: ohci-at91: Check result of clk_get()

2017-03-07 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 02:53:43PM -0800, Andrey Smirnov wrote: > Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov > --- > drivers/usb/host/ohci-at91.c | 9 + > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ohci-at91.c b/drivers/usb/host/ohci-at91.c > index

Re: [PATCH 00/45] AT91, at91sam9x5ek updates

2017-03-07 Thread Sam Ravnborg
Hi Andrey. On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 02:53:11PM -0800, Andrey Smirnov wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I recently had a chance to work with at91sam9x5ek board and as a part > of that effort I converted the code to support features found in > Barebox for i.MX based SoCs. Most notably this patchset

[PATCH] scripts: imx/mxs remove mxs-usb-loader

2017-03-07 Thread Oleksij Rempel
... and use imx-usb-loader instead Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel --- arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig | 7 +- arch/arm/mach-mxs/Kconfig | 7 +- scripts/Makefile | 7 +- scripts/imx/Kconfig | 6 ++ scripts/mxs-usb-loader.c | 236

[PATCH] ARM: imx233-olinuxino: add CONFIG_CONSOLE_ACTIVATE_ALL

2017-03-07 Thread Oleksij Rempel
if not set, barebox will use first console by default. On this board first console is KEYBOARD_GPIO, so we will end in unusable state. Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel --- arch/arm/configs/imx233-olinuxino_defconfig | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git

[PATCH 1/2] x86: efi: fix efiexit support

2017-03-07 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD --- arch/x86/mach-efi/elf_x86_64_efi.lds.S | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/arch/x86/mach-efi/elf_x86_64_efi.lds.S b/arch/x86/mach-efi/elf_x86_64_efi.lds.S index e1bc2120f..93d34d17a 100644 ---

[PATCH 2/2] x86: efi: fix logo support

2017-03-07 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
we need to copy the logo section too Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD --- arch/x86/Makefile | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/Makefile b/arch/x86/Makefile index e837a2df9..6921b10a7 100644 --- a/arch/x86/Makefile

[PATCH] fixup! efi: move x86 efi boot support to x86 arch

2017-03-07 Thread Michael Olbrich
As I noted in my other mail, this got lost during the move. Regards, Michael --- arch/x86/Makefile | 4 ++-- arch/x86/mach-efi/elf_x86_64_efi.lds.S | 1 + 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/Makefile b/arch/x86/Makefile index

Re: [PATCH 00/45] AT91, at91sam9x5ek updates

2017-03-07 Thread Sascha Hauer
Hi Andrey, On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 02:53:11PM -0800, Andrey Smirnov wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I recently had a chance to work with at91sam9x5ek board and as a part > of that effort I converted the code to support features found in > Barebox for i.MX based SoCs. Most notably this patchset