Re: [PATCH] i.MX: clk-pllv3: Initially disable PLL_BYPASS bit

2017-07-12 Thread Lucas Stach
Am Dienstag, den 11.07.2017, 11:30 +0200 schrieb Philipp Zabel: > Commit cbff8031b491 ("i.MX: clk-pllv3: Do not touch PLL_BYPASS bit") > overreached a bit by removing the code that disables the PLL_BYPASS bit > for all architectures instead of making an exception for Vybrid and > i.MX6SL. This

Re: [PATCH v2] crypto: caam: use dma_alloc_coherent instead of dma_alloc

2017-07-12 Thread Lucas Stach
Am Mittwoch, den 12.07.2017, 06:40 +0200 schrieb Oleksij Rempel: > It is a fixup for following patch: > | commit ef4144b4ab6301d7417af3eb4d79cfc66bf0e731 > | Date: Wed Mar 22 10:14:37 2017 +0100 > | > |crypto: caam - fix RNG buffer cache alignment > > Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel

Re: [PATCH] i.MX: clk-pllv3: Initially disable PLL_BYPASS bit

2017-07-12 Thread Philipp Zabel
On Wed, 2017-07-12 at 11:52 +0200, Philipp Zabel wrote: > On Wed, 2017-07-12 at 10:56 +0200, Lucas Stach wrote: > > Am Dienstag, den 11.07.2017, 12:41 -0500 schrieb Andrey Smirnov: > > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 4:30 AM, Philipp Zabel > > > wrote: > > > > Commit

Re: [PATCH] i.MX: clk-pllv3: Initially disable PLL_BYPASS bit

2017-07-12 Thread Philipp Zabel
On Wed, 2017-07-12 at 10:56 +0200, Lucas Stach wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 11.07.2017, 12:41 -0500 schrieb Andrey Smirnov: > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 4:30 AM, Philipp Zabel > > wrote: > > > Commit cbff8031b491 ("i.MX: clk-pllv3: Do not touch PLL_BYPASS bit") > > >

Re: [PATCH] i.MX: clk-pllv3: Initially disable PLL_BYPASS bit

2017-07-12 Thread Lucas Stach
Am Dienstag, den 11.07.2017, 12:41 -0500 schrieb Andrey Smirnov: > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 4:30 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote: > > Commit cbff8031b491 ("i.MX: clk-pllv3: Do not touch PLL_BYPASS bit") > > overreached a bit by removing the code that disables the PLL_BYPASS bit > >

Re: Bootchooser - remaining_attempts

2017-07-12 Thread Çağlar Kilimci
Hello Martin, Firstly, thank you for your reply. 2017-07-11 12:45 GMT+03:00 Martin Hollingsworth : > Hello Caglar, > I am no expert in bootchooser, but I am currently implementing it on an imx6 > board using barebox 2017-3. > > Regarding the first issue.