Re: STM32MP1 SoC support in latest Barebox

2019-03-22 Thread Robert Schwebel
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 10:46:31AM +0100, Yann Sionneau wrote: > By searching in list archive you could have found: > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/barebox/2019-March/037572.html > > So there is a bit of support, which has been commited in "next" branch. > > See >

Re: STM32MP1 SoC support in latest Barebox

2019-03-22 Thread Yann Sionneau
Hello, By searching in list archive you could have found: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/barebox/2019-March/037572.html So there is a bit of support, which has been commited in "next" branch. See https://git.pengutronix.de/cgit/barebox/tree/arch/arm/boards/stm32mp157c-dk2?h=next No

Re: STM32MP1 SoC support in latest Barebox

2019-03-22 Thread gianluca
On 03/22/2019 09:07 AM, gianluca wrote: I need a __very quick__ answer to this subject, because a customer wants to migrate from a iMX28 based board to a STM32MP1. Now I've just clone the git repo from pengutronix, and a mere: grep -r stm32mp1 * dts/Bindings/mailbox/stm32-ipcc.txt:-

STM32MP1 SoC support in latest Barebox

2019-03-22 Thread gianluca
Hello list! I need a __very quick__ answer to this subject, because a customer wants to migrate from a iMX28 based board to a STM32MP1. Actually the iMX28 board was developed by me, 6 years ago and it has Barebox 2013.02, Linux Kernel 3.12.1 and a Debian Wheezy. It runs from eMMC, but it

Re: [PATCH 04/15] ARM: Add arm64 pbl udelay

2019-03-22 Thread Andrey Smirnov
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 1:16 AM Sascha Hauer wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 11:12:19AM -0700, Andrey Smirnov wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 3:27 AM Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > > > > PBL often needs a way to udelay execution. Since we have a generic timer > > > in ARMv8 we can implement a