Recently, I'm using barebox in a deep embedded project, and need some funtctions
in libc/libm, So I linked barebox with newlib
But whenever newlib call sbrk with negtive `increment`, barebox crash.
The reason is sbrk clean memory region using `increment`.
Why sbrk must clear the increased
Hello Sam,
On 2/4/19 20:01, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Hi Ahmad.
>
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 12:18:22PM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
>> The newly added device tree based first stage fails to load the second
>> stage from MMC, which might be in relation to a preceding atmel_mci
>> "command/data timeout"
Hello Sam,
On 2/4/19 19:49, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Hi Ahmad.
>
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 12:18:18PM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
>> Incoming microchip-ksz9477-evb first stage will add one more entry point
>> for the first stage. As there is a little reason to use the same piggy
>> data for both
On 1/4/19 14:20, Roland Hieber wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 12:18:09PM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
>> Incoming sama5d3 bootstrap code has been ported from the at91bootstrap
>> project and is licensed under a 1-clause BSD license. To remove
>> boilerplate legal text there, place the license at a
