Inconsistent "compatible" string for Terasic DE0-Nano-SoC / Atlas SoC Kit

2021-11-02 Thread Ian Abbott
Hi there! I have a slight issue getting BootLoaderSpec entries for Terasic DE0-Nano-SoC to work: barebox@Terasic DE0-Nano-SoC/Atlas-SoC Kit:/ boot mmc0 blspec: ignoring entry with incompatible devicetree "terasic,de0-atlas" Nothing bootable found on 'mmc0' Nothing bootable found From the

Re: [PATCH] ARM: socfpga: Set reset-names property for

2021-11-02 Thread Ian Abbott
On 02/11/2021 08:01, Sascha Hauer wrote: On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 05:40:53PM +, Ian Abbott wrote: Since commit 90bdf1e5d1e4 ("mci: dw_mmc: match against StarFive MMC compatibles"), the dw_mmc driver requires a reset line called "reset". The slightly earlier commit a3cf324593ea ("mci: dw_mmc:

Re: [PATCH master] mci: dw_mmc: make reset control optional again

2021-11-02 Thread Philipp Zabel
On Tue, 2021-11-02 at 09:06 +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 06:52:07PM +0100, Ahmad Fatoum wrote: > > As documented in 90bdf1e5d1e4 ("mci: dw_mmc: match against StarFive MMC > > compatibles"), it was intended for the reset to remain optional as to > > not break existing users.

Re: [PATCH master] mci: dw_mmc: make reset control optional again

2021-11-02 Thread Sascha Hauer
On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 06:52:07PM +0100, Ahmad Fatoum wrote: > As documented in 90bdf1e5d1e4 ("mci: dw_mmc: match against StarFive MMC > compatibles"), it was intended for the reset to remain optional as to > not break existing users. Unfortunately, my later a3cf324593ea > ("mci: dw_mmc: add

Re: [PATCH] ARM: socfpga: Set reset-names property for

2021-11-02 Thread Sascha Hauer
On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 05:40:53PM +, Ian Abbott wrote: > Since commit 90bdf1e5d1e4 ("mci: dw_mmc: match against StarFive MMC > compatibles"), the dw_mmc driver requires a reset line called "reset". > The slightly earlier commit a3cf324593ea ("mci: dw_mmc: add optional > reset line")

Re: [PATCH] phy: core: Make 'phy_optional_get' return NULL when not implemented

2021-11-02 Thread Sascha Hauer
On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 11:33:07AM -0700, Trent Piepho wrote: >On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 2:01 AM Sascha Hauer <[1]s...@pengutronix.de> wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 10:39:54AM +0200, Daniel BrĂ¡t wrote: >> > Make 'phy_optional_get' return NULL instead of ERR_PTR(-ENOSYS) when >the