Thanks for the fix.
Peter
On 8/26/2016 7:45 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 11:32:43PM +0200, Peter Kardos wrote:
Tested this one as well with my AT91RM9200 system, v2016.08 + patch; The
system starts/boots as expected.
If no one objects, we can consider this issue closed
these Socs we correctly
created the vector page, but the pages around it did not have a 1:1
mapping anymore which led to unreachable peripherals.
Fixes: f6b77fe9: ARM: Rework vector table setup
Reported-by: Peter Kardos
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer
---
Changes since v1:
- Use ALIGN_DOWN instead
Hi Sascha,
Can confirm, with v2016.08 + patch the system boots and seems to work as
expected.
Thanks for your help with this issue.
Cheers, Peter
On 8/24/2016 2:24 PM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
Hi Peter,
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 10:39:24PM +0200, Peter Kardos wrote:
Hi Sascha,
I've t
SoCs which have
peripherals in that area, for example Atmel SoCs like the AT91RM9200.
Fixes: f6b77fe9: ARM: Rework vector table setup
Reported-by: Peter Kardos
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer
---
arch/arm/cpu/mmu.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu
Hi Sascha,
I've tested your workaround and it seems to work; the board starts and
attempts
to boot.
Peter
On 8/22/2016 11:00 AM, Peter Kardos wrote:
During the weekend I've played with this some more...
It seems that the "breakage" was introduced with v2016.05. This ve
ht when i get home.
Peter
On 2016-08-22 08:10, Sascha Hauer wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:15:33PM +0200, Peter Kardos wrote:
Hi Sascha,
I may have something. It seems the memory (MMU?) gets "messed" up;
Reading the debug uart registers (v2015.07) gives reasonable results, like
6 10:00 AM, Peter Kardos wrote:
Hi Sascha,
So you have a jtag debugger attached, does it support showing registers?
What is the value of uart->base? Is it correct?
Also you could compare the UART registers with the ones from a working
U-Boot/barebox.
Yes, I have, it does. I've checked,
ck is disabled for some reason,
Was thinking the same thing.
I'll check it (compare reg dumps, console init) tonight and report my
findings.
Cheers, Peter
On 2016-08-18 09:38, Sascha Hauer wrote:
Hi Peter,
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 03:08:36AM +0200, Peter Kardos wrote:
Greetings,
Greetings,
I'm looking for a AT91 specialist that could help me debug barebox v2016.08.
I have a custom board running AT91RM9200 that came with a really old
custom u-boot (v1.1.4, no ubifs support)...
The first bootloader I've ported (barebox v2015.07, using AT91RM9200ek
as template) almost
