Re: [PATCH] net phy: poll for a link

2012-10-28 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 12:21 Sun 28 Oct , Sascha Hauer wrote: > Jean-Christophe, > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 08:37:11AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 08:33:59PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD > > wrote: > > > On 20:06 Wed 24 Oct , Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > > Since we have ph

Re: [PATCH] net phy: poll for a link

2012-10-28 Thread Sascha Hauer
Jean-Christophe, On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 08:37:11AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 08:33:59PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD > wrote: > > On 20:06 Wed 24 Oct , Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > Since we have phylib we have no instance which polls for a link. This > > >

Re: [PATCH] net phy: poll for a link

2012-10-25 Thread Eric Bénard
Le Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:11:06 +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD a écrit : > On 11:05 Thu 25 Oct , Eric Bénard wrote: > > Le Thu, 25 Oct 2012 10:49:02 +0200, > > Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD a écrit : > > > > > On 21:56 Wed 24 Oct , Eric Bénard wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > >

Re: [PATCH] net phy: poll for a link

2012-10-25 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 11:05 Thu 25 Oct , Eric Bénard wrote: > Le Thu, 25 Oct 2012 10:49:02 +0200, > Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD a écrit : > > > On 21:56 Wed 24 Oct , Eric Bénard wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Le Wed, 24 Oct 2012 20:33:59 +0200, > > > Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD a écrit : > > > >

Re: [PATCH] net phy: poll for a link

2012-10-25 Thread Eric Bénard
Le Thu, 25 Oct 2012 10:49:02 +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD a écrit : > On 21:56 Wed 24 Oct , Eric Bénard wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Le Wed, 24 Oct 2012 20:33:59 +0200, > > Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD a écrit : > > > > > On 20:06 Wed 24 Oct , Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > > Since

Re: [PATCH] net phy: poll for a link

2012-10-25 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 21:56 Wed 24 Oct , Eric Bénard wrote: > Hi, > > Le Wed, 24 Oct 2012 20:33:59 +0200, > Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD a écrit : > > > On 20:06 Wed 24 Oct , Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > Since we have phylib we have no instance which polls for a link. This > > > means that network boot of

Re: [PATCH] net phy: poll for a link

2012-10-24 Thread Sascha Hauer
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 08:33:59PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 20:06 Wed 24 Oct , Sascha Hauer wrote: > > Since we have phylib we have no instance which polls for a link. This > > means that network boot often bails out after a powercycle or phy reset. > > This changes

Re: [PATCH] net phy: poll for a link

2012-10-24 Thread Eric Bénard
Hi, Le Wed, 24 Oct 2012 20:33:59 +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD a écrit : > On 20:06 Wed 24 Oct , Sascha Hauer wrote: > > Since we have phylib we have no instance which polls for a link. This > > means that network boot often bails out after a powercycle or phy reset. > > This chang

Re: [PATCH] net phy: poll for a link

2012-10-24 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 20:06 Wed 24 Oct , Sascha Hauer wrote: > Since we have phylib we have no instance which polls for a link. This > means that network boot often bails out after a powercycle or phy reset. > This changes the link status behaviour to: > > - Always check for a link if the last link test was unsu

[PATCH] net phy: poll for a link

2012-10-24 Thread Sascha Hauer
Since we have phylib we have no instance which polls for a link. This means that network boot often bails out after a powercycle or phy reset. This changes the link status behaviour to: - Always check for a link if the last link test was unsuccesful - If the last check was succesful, check for a l