On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 11:07:09AM +0200, Aleksander Morgado wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On 19/06/17 08:46, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> >> I went through the RFC916 and ended up preparing a set of fixes and
> >> improvements for the RATP logic in barebox.
> >> Let me know what you think.
> > As far as I can say
Hey,
On 19/06/17 08:46, Sascha Hauer wrote:
>> I went through the RFC916 and ended up preparing a set of fixes and
>> improvements for the RATP logic in barebox.
>> Let me know what you think.
> As far as I can say the patches look good. It's quite a while since I
> last looked at the RATP code,
Hi Aleksander,
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 01:14:04PM +0200, Aleksander Morgado wrote:
> Hey Sascha,
>
> I went through the RFC916 and ended up preparing a set of fixes and
> improvements for the RATP logic in barebox.
> Let me know what you think.
As far as I can say the patches look good. It's qu
Hey Sascha,
I went through the RFC916 and ended up preparing a set of fixes and
improvements for the RATP logic in barebox.
Let me know what you think.
Cheers!
Aleksander Morgado (16):
ratp: add missing transition to SYN-RECEIVED in behavior B
ratp: avoid unnecessary variable initialization