> > > > > > On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 10:21:39PM +0200, Jean-Christophe
> > > > > > PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > > > > >> this brake the nand support on at91sam9x5ek
> > > > > >> where we have a non compliant ONFI nand
> > > > > >> NAND device: Manufacturer ID: 0xad, Chip ID: 0xda (Hynix NAND
> > >
> > > > > On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 10:21:39PM +0200, Jean-Christophe
> > > > > PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > > > >> this brake the nand support on at91sam9x5ek
> > > > >> where we have a non compliant ONFI nand
> > > > >> NAND device: Manufacturer ID: 0xad, Chip ID: 0xda (Hynix NAND 256MiB
> > > > >
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 10:46:13AM +0400, Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> > > > On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 10:21:39PM +0200, Jean-Christophe
> > > > PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > > >> this brake the nand support on at91sam9x5ek
> > > >> where we have a non compliant ONFI nand
> > > >> NAND device: Manufactur
> > > On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 10:21:39PM +0200, Jean-Christophe
> > > PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > >> this brake the nand support on at91sam9x5ek
> > >> where we have a non compliant ONFI nand
> > >> NAND device: Manufacturer ID: 0xad, Chip ID: 0xda (Hynix NAND 256MiB
> > >> 3,3V 8-bit), 256MiB, p
On 18:25 Wed 08 May , Eric Bénard wrote:
> Hi Jean-Christophe,
>
> Le Wed, 8 May 2013 15:30:24 +0800,
> Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD a écrit :
>
> >
> > On May 8, 2013, at 1:11 PM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 10:21:39PM +0200, Jean-Christophe
> > > PLAGNIOL-
Hi Jean-Christophe,
Le Wed, 8 May 2013 15:30:24 +0800,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD a écrit :
>
> On May 8, 2013, at 1:11 PM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
>
> > On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 10:21:39PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
> > wrote:
> >> this brake the nand support on at91sam9x5ek
>
On May 8, 2013, at 1:11 PM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 10:21:39PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
> wrote:
>> this brake the nand support on at91sam9x5ek
>> where we have a non compliant ONFI nand
>> NAND device: Manufacturer ID: 0xad, Chip ID: 0xda (Hynix NAND 256MiB
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 10:21:39PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
wrote:
> this brake the nand support on at91sam9x5ek
> where we have a non compliant ONFI nand
> NAND device: Manufacturer ID: 0xad, Chip ID: 0xda (Hynix NAND 256MiB 3,3V
> 8-bit), 256MiB, page size: 2048, OOB size: 64
>
this brake the nand support on at91sam9x5ek
where we have a non compliant ONFI nand
NAND device: Manufacturer ID: 0xad, Chip ID: 0xda (Hynix NAND 256MiB 3,3V
8-bit), 256MiB, page size: 2048, OOB size: 64
This reverts commit 4c2bdc8728016b3412523e3264651651fe752860.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe