On 08:26 Mon 23 Jul , Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 08:24:40AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > Hi Jean-Christophe,
> >
> > On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 09:31:36PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
> > wrote:
> > > Keep the previous target untouched.
> > > This will allow to do
On 08:24 Mon 23 Jul , Sascha Hauer wrote:
> Hi Jean-Christophe,
>
> On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 09:31:36PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
> wrote:
> > Keep the previous target untouched.
> > This will allow to do not brake the modules support.
>
> This breaks images which use barebox.bi
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 08:24:40AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> Hi Jean-Christophe,
>
> On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 09:31:36PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
> wrote:
> > Keep the previous target untouched.
> > This will allow to do not brake the modules support.
>
> This breaks images whic
Hi Jean-Christophe,
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 09:31:36PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
wrote:
> Keep the previous target untouched.
> This will allow to do not brake the modules support.
This breaks images which use barebox.bin as an input for their SoC
specific image, like MLO (Omap xlo
Keep the previous target untouched.
This will allow to do not brake the modules support.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
---
This patch apply over my previous patch series that add gzip support
Best Regards,
J.
Makefile | 49 ++--