Ok, let's do it like that
Best regards,
Raphaël Poggi
2014-08-06 5:48 GMT+02:00 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
plagn...@jcrosoft.com:
On Aug 6, 2014, at 11:46 AM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
plagn...@jcrosoft.com wrote:
On Aug 5, 2014, at 7:38 PM, Raphaël Poggi raphi...@gmail.com
On Aug 5, 2014, at 2:37 AM, Raphaël Poggi raphi...@gmail.com wrote:
I have planned to add device tree support for the AT91 port.
So I port the pinctrl driver from linux to barebox to be able to use
the pinctrl in device tree, but maybe I made a mistake and there is
another solution.
Ok, so I drop my patch ? Or your version is very similar of my patch
and you can review mine to improve/clean it ?
Best regards,
Raphaël Poggi
2014-08-05 12:26 GMT+02:00 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
plagn...@jcrosoft.com:
On Aug 5, 2014, at 2:37 AM, Raphaël Poggi raphi...@gmail.com wrote:
I have planned to add device tree support for the AT91 port.
So I port the pinctrl driver from linux to barebox to be able to use
the pinctrl in device tree, but maybe I made a mistake and there is
another solution.
Best Regards,
Raphaël
2014-08-04 20:26 GMT+02:00 Jean-Christophe
On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 08:37:35PM +0200, Raphaël Poggi wrote:
I have planned to add device tree support for the AT91 port.
So I port the pinctrl driver from linux to barebox to be able to use
the pinctrl in device tree, but maybe I made a mistake and there is
another solution.
Nope. When
This driver is based on mach-at91/gpio.c and linux pinctrl driver.
The driver contains the gpio and pinctrl parts (like in linux) because the two
parts
share some structures and logics.
Signed-off-by: Raphaël Poggi poggi.r...@gmail.com
---
drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig|6 +
