Re: [PATCH 6/7] macb: fix tx ring size

2013-02-11 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 17:33 Mon 11 Feb , Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 10:18:49AM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD > wrote: > > the mininal tx ring size is 2 as if one we wrap on the same descriptor > > and can cause IP lock on GEM (gigabit version) this is always the case > > > > Signed-

Re: [PATCH 6/7] macb: fix tx ring size

2013-02-11 Thread Sascha Hauer
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 10:18:49AM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > the mininal tx ring size is 2 as if one we wrap on the same descriptor > and can cause IP lock on GEM (gigabit version) this is always the case > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre > Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PL

Re: [PATCH 6/7] macb: fix tx ring size

2013-02-08 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 13:20 Fri 08 Feb , Alexander Aring wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 10:18:49AM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD > wrote: > > the mininal tx ring size is 2 as if one we wrap on the same descriptor > > and can cause IP lock on GEM (gigabit version) this is always the case > >

Re: [PATCH 6/7] macb: fix tx ring size

2013-02-08 Thread Alexander Aring
Hi, On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 10:18:49AM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > the mininal tx ring size is 2 as if one we wrap on the same descriptor > and can cause IP lock on GEM (gigabit version) this is always the case > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre > Signed-off-by: Jean-Christop

[PATCH 6/7] macb: fix tx ring size

2013-02-08 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
the mininal tx ring size is 2 as if one we wrap on the same descriptor and can cause IP lock on GEM (gigabit version) this is always the case Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD --- drivers/net/macb.c | 50 ++