On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 08:36:35AM +0200, Michael Olbrich wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 04:12:39PM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> > On 09.06.22 16:10, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 03:09:36PM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> > >> Fastboot would fall back to a raw copy even for bbu-
On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 04:12:39PM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> On 09.06.22 16:10, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 03:09:36PM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> >> Fastboot would fall back to a raw copy even for bbu- partitions if
> >> no barebox_update handler was found. Prevent this by
On 09.06.22 16:10, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 03:09:36PM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
>> Fastboot would fall back to a raw copy even for bbu- partitions if
>> no barebox_update handler was found. Prevent this by bailing out
>> with an error code.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum
On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 03:09:36PM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> Fastboot would fall back to a raw copy even for bbu- partitions if
> no barebox_update handler was found. Prevent this by bailing out
> with an error code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum
> ---
> v2 -> v3:
> - bail out instead of o
Fastboot would fall back to a raw copy even for bbu- partitions if
no barebox_update handler was found. Prevent this by bailing out
with an error code.
Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum
---
v2 -> v3:
- bail out instead of only printing message and falling back
to raw copy (Sascha)
v1 -> v2:
- p
