On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 11:10:19AM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
wrote:
On 10:54 Fri 13 Mar , Jan Lübbe wrote:
On Do, 2015-03-12 at 18:50 +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
do as in the kernel use the string as we may want to add hw IP
You mean we should add a
On 10:54 Fri 13 Mar , Jan Lübbe wrote:
On Do, 2015-03-12 at 18:50 +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
do as in the kernel use the string as we may want to add hw IP
You mean we should add a priority instead? The kernel also has separate
names for the algorithm and for the
On Do, 2015-03-12 at 18:50 +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
do as in the kernel use the string as we may want to add hw IP
You mean we should add a priority instead? The kernel also has separate
names for the algorithm and for the driver.
Regards,
Jan
--
Pengutronix e.K.
From: Sascha Hauer s.ha...@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer s.ha...@pengutronix.de
---
This is also needed as the first patch for the FIT support series. It seems
I can't count to 5.
common/digest.c | 12
crypto/md5.c | 1 +
crypto/sha1.c| 1 +
crypto/sha2.c
On 15:51 Thu 12 Mar , Jan Luebbe wrote:
From: Sascha Hauer s.ha...@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer s.ha...@pengutronix.de
---
This is also needed as the first patch for the FIT support series. It seems
I can't count to 5.
common/digest.c | 12
