Hi Sascha,
Can confirm, with v2016.08 + patch the system boots and seems to work as
expected.
Thanks for your help with this issue.
Cheers, Peter
On 8/24/2016 2:24 PM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
Hi Peter,
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 10:39:24PM +0200, Peter Kardos wrote:
Hi Sascha,
I've tested your
Hi Peter,
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 10:39:24PM +0200, Peter Kardos wrote:
> Hi Sascha,
>
> I've tested your workaround and it seems to work; the board starts and
> attempts
> to boot.
I just sent a proper solution for that problem, you're on Cc. I'm
confident that this solves your problem. Could y
Hi Sascha,
I've tested your workaround and it seems to work; the board starts and
attempts
to boot.
Peter
On 8/22/2016 11:00 AM, Peter Kardos wrote:
During the weekend I've played with this some more...
It seems that the "breakage" was introduced with v2016.05. This version
introduced the "e
During the weekend I've played with this some more...
It seems that the "breakage" was introduced with v2016.05. This version
introduced the "exception vector remapping to 0x*".
Unfortunately AT91RM9200 has peripherals in this region.
I'll test the patch tonight when i get home.
Peter
On 20
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:15:33PM +0200, Peter Kardos wrote:
> Hi Sascha,
>
> I may have something. It seems the memory (MMU?) gets "messed" up;
>
> Reading the debug uart registers (v2015.07) gives reasonable results, like
> (gdb) x/32w 0xf200
> 0xf200:0x0x08
Hi Sascha,
I may have something. It seems the memory (MMU?) gets "messed" up;
Reading the debug uart registers (v2015.07) gives reasonable results, like
(gdb) x/32w 0xf200
0xf200:0x0x08000x 0x
0xf210:0x0x40001a1a
Hi Sascha,
So you have a jtag debugger attached, does it support showing registers?
What is the value of uart->base? Is it correct?
Also you could compare the UART registers with the ones from a working
U-Boot/barebox.
Yes, I have, it does. I've checked, and it seems to be correct, pointing
to
Hi Peter,
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 03:08:36AM +0200, Peter Kardos wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I'm looking for a AT91 specialist that could help me debug barebox v2016.08.
>
> I have a custom board running AT91RM9200 that came with a really old custom
> u-boot (v1.1.4, no ubifs support)...
>
> The fi
Greetings,
I'm looking for a AT91 specialist that could help me debug barebox v2016.08.
I have a custom board running AT91RM9200 that came with a really old
custom u-boot (v1.1.4, no ubifs support)...
The first bootloader I've ported (barebox v2015.07, using AT91RM9200ek
as template) almost
