Re: atmel_nand pmecc on 8k page [RFC]

2014-06-18 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 15:19 Mon 16 Jun , Bo Shen wrote: Hi Matteo, On 06/13/2014 08:48 PM, Matteo Fortini wrote: Hi all, glad you found my patch useful. Sascha rejected it because he sees it more fit to separate the initialization of sama5d3 and sam9 since they are quite different. I started, as

Re: atmel_nand pmecc on 8k page [RFC]

2014-06-18 Thread Bo Shen
Hi Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD, On 06/19/2014 12:31 PM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: On 15:19 Mon 16 Jun , Bo Shen wrote: Hi Matteo, On 06/13/2014 08:48 PM, Matteo Fortini wrote: Hi all, glad you found my patch useful. Sascha rejected it because he sees it more fit to

Re: atmel_nand pmecc on 8k page [RFC]

2014-06-16 Thread Bo Shen
Hi Matteo, On 06/13/2014 08:48 PM, Matteo Fortini wrote: Hi all, glad you found my patch useful. Sascha rejected it because he sees it more fit to separate the initialization of sama5d3 and sam9 since they are quite different. I started, as advised by Sascha, to create into sam9_smc.c the

Re: atmel_nand pmecc on 8k page [RFC]

2014-06-13 Thread Matteo Fortini
Hi all, glad you found my patch useful. Sascha rejected it because he sees it more fit to separate the initialization of sama5d3 and sam9 since they are quite different. I started, as advised by Sascha, to create into sam9_smc.c the function void sama5d3_smc_configure(int id, int cs, struct