On 15:19 Mon 16 Jun , Bo Shen wrote:
Hi Matteo,
On 06/13/2014 08:48 PM, Matteo Fortini wrote:
Hi all,
glad you found my patch useful. Sascha rejected it because he sees it
more fit to separate the initialization of sama5d3 and sam9 since they
are quite different.
I started, as
Hi Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD,
On 06/19/2014 12:31 PM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
On 15:19 Mon 16 Jun , Bo Shen wrote:
Hi Matteo,
On 06/13/2014 08:48 PM, Matteo Fortini wrote:
Hi all,
glad you found my patch useful. Sascha rejected it because he sees it
more fit to
Hi Matteo,
On 06/13/2014 08:48 PM, Matteo Fortini wrote:
Hi all,
glad you found my patch useful. Sascha rejected it because he sees it
more fit to separate the initialization of sama5d3 and sam9 since they
are quite different.
I started, as advised by Sascha, to create into sam9_smc.c the
Hi all,
glad you found my patch useful. Sascha rejected it because he sees it
more fit to separate the initialization of sama5d3 and sam9 since they
are quite different.
I started, as advised by Sascha, to create into sam9_smc.c the function
void sama5d3_smc_configure(int id, int cs, struct
