Re: picoTCP, barebox, and licenses

2014-06-09 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On Jun 6, 2014, at 3:37 PM, Antony Pavlov wrote: > > On Thu, 5 Jun 2014 21:48:10 +0200 > Frederik Van Slycken wrote: > >> 2014-06-05 21:36 GMT+02:00 Frederik Van Slycken >> : >>> 2014-06-05 21:30 GMT+02:00 Robert Schwebel : Where is that in the wiki? IMHO it isn't correct, the toplevel C

Re: picoTCP, barebox, and licenses

2014-06-06 Thread Antony Pavlov
On Thu, 5 Jun 2014 21:48:10 +0200 Frederik Van Slycken wrote: > 2014-06-05 21:36 GMT+02:00 Frederik Van Slycken > : > > 2014-06-05 21:30 GMT+02:00 Robert Schwebel : > >> Where is that in the wiki? IMHO it isn't correct, the toplevel COPYING > >> file says v2, which is also our intention. > > > >

Re: picoTCP, barebox, and licenses

2014-06-06 Thread Antony Pavlov
On Thu, 5 Jun 2014 21:48:10 +0200 Frederik Van Slycken wrote: > 2014-06-05 21:36 GMT+02:00 Frederik Van Slycken > : > > 2014-06-05 21:30 GMT+02:00 Robert Schwebel : > >> Where is that in the wiki? IMHO it isn't correct, the toplevel COPYING > >> file says v2, which is also our intention. > > > >

Re: picoTCP, barebox, and licenses

2014-06-05 Thread Frederik Van Slycken
2014-06-05 21:36 GMT+02:00 Frederik Van Slycken : > 2014-06-05 21:30 GMT+02:00 Robert Schwebel : >> Where is that in the wiki? IMHO it isn't correct, the toplevel COPYING >> file says v2, which is also our intention. > > http://wiki.barebox.org/doku.php#license > > """ > This program is free softwa

Re: picoTCP, barebox, and licenses

2014-06-05 Thread Frederik Van Slycken
2014-06-05 21:30 GMT+02:00 Robert Schwebel : > Where is that in the wiki? IMHO it isn't correct, the toplevel COPYING > file says v2, which is also our intention. http://wiki.barebox.org/doku.php#license """ This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms o

Re: picoTCP, barebox, and licenses

2014-06-05 Thread Robert Schwebel
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 09:24:51PM +0200, Frederik Van Slycken wrote: > I applaud that you're working on incorporating picoTCP into barebox - > I work for the company that developed picoTCP, and so I am naturally > enthusiastic about this. However, one small thing that should be taken > into accoun

picoTCP, barebox, and licenses

2014-06-05 Thread Frederik Van Slycken
Dear Antony, I applaud that you're working on incorporating picoTCP into barebox - I work for the company that developed picoTCP, and so I am naturally enthusiastic about this. However, one small thing that should be taken into account, concerning licensing. According to the wiki, barebox is lice