For f'' read f'  .................

   MH
   --- On Sat, 24/9/11, Martyn Hodgson <hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

     From: Martyn Hodgson <hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk>
     Subject: [BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: v Radolt's lutes again
     To: "baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu" <baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>,
     "lute.cor...@sunrise.ch" <lute.cor...@sunrise.ch>, "Christopher
     Pearcy" <c.pear...@uni.brighton.ac.uk>
     Date: Saturday, 24 September, 2011, 9:14

      Dear Chris,
      Thank you for this.
      Our paper suggested a 'reicht grosse ordinari Lautten' (proper large
      common lute) in the nominal Dm tuning at 72cm - which, based on the
      breaking stress of gut, indicates a pitch of the first course (at
      nominal f'') a whole tone below A440 ie at A392: - I'm not sure how
   you
      deduce from this that we suggest that such a sized lute would have
   its
      first course at c' at A467 (this would give a first course nominal
      pitch at A392 of only d#' not f'' as we suggest).
      Regarding your Frei instrument the usual advice might be best: tune
   it
      so that the first course is as close to breaking as practical (ie
      without breaking too frequently).
      MH
      .--- On Fri, 23/9/11, Christopher Pearcy
   <[1]c.pear...@uni.brighton.ac.uk>
      wrote:
        From: Christopher Pearcy <[2]c.pear...@uni.brighton.ac.uk>
        Subject: RE: [BAROQUE-LUTE] v Radolt's lutes again
        To: "Martyn Hodgson" <[3]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk>,
        "[4]baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu"
   <[5]baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>,
        "[6]lute.cor...@sunrise.ch" <[7]lute.cor...@sunrise.ch>
        Date: Friday, 23 September, 2011, 19:04
      Thank you Martyn and Andreas
      However this leaves me even more puzzled. If v Radolt's reicht
   grosse
      ordinari lautten is a pretty standard German lute of around 72cm and
      its chanterelle is tuned at c1 at A467 it would be working well
   below
      its working tension (breaking tension minus 2 or 3 semitones). Might
      the mittere lautten be the the 'standard' lute and the grosse
   ordinari
      lautten be ordinari because it's an 11c lute and not a theorbo
   (another
      sort of grosse lautten) and grosse because it's above 'standard'
   size
      (like some of the Edlinger lutes)? This of course questions what
   chor,
      cornet and kammer - ton were in 1701 in Vienna - unless the strings
      played at a very high pitch, but that would probably cause problems
   in
      terms of the working tension of the violins. What solution does
   Hubert
      Hoffmann offer?
      My original question was to help me decide on a pitch for my small
   Frei
      but I think this may be muddying the waters. Please feel free to
   ignore
      this line of puzzling if you find it irritating.
      Best wishes
      Chris
        __________________________________________________________________
      From: Martyn Hodgson [[8]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk]
      Sent: 23 September 2011 08:48
      To: [9]baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu; Christopher Pearcy
      Subject: Re: [BAROQUE-LUTE] v Radolt's lutes again
      See the paper by Bill Samson and myself (FoMRHI Comm 737 - available
      from the FoMRHI archives) about Von Radolt's instructions.
      Regarding the sizes of the lutes, the instructions suggest various
      sizes of 11 course lutes lute ranging from approx 54cm string length
      (Radolt's very small lute)  through a middle sized lute around 61 cm
   to
      his proper common lute at 72cm.
      The likely pitch (discussed in the paper) is determind by the
      instrument's string length and tensile strength of gut.
      MH
      --- On Fri, 23/9/11, Christopher Pearcy
   <[10]c.pear...@uni.brighton.ac.uk>
      wrote:
        From: Christopher Pearcy <[11]c.pear...@uni.brighton.ac.uk>
        Subject: [BAROQUE-LUTE] v Radolt's lutes again
        To: "[12]baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu"
   <[13]baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
        Date: Friday, 23 September, 2011, 8:29
         Dear all
         If anyone has a copy of the v. Radolt lute concerti, could you
   tell
      me
         what are the (nominal) pitches of his 3 lutes in relation to the
      string
         parts. I'm looking at alternative pitching for my small Frei -
   and
      this
         may give me additional data to add to breaking index and pitch
         standards.
         Thanks in anticipation.
         Chris
         --
      To get on or off this list see list information at
      [1][14]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
      --
   References
      1. [15]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --

References

   1. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=c.pear...@uni.brighton.ac.uk
   2. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=c.pear...@uni.brighton.ac.uk
   3. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk
   4. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
   5. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
   6. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=lute.cor...@sunrise.ch
   7. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=lute.cor...@sunrise.ch
   8. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk
   9. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
  10. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=c.pear...@uni.brighton.ac.uk
  11. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=c.pear...@uni.brighton.ac.uk
  12. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
  13. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
  14. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  15. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to