Ah, yes, I see. Thanks for the information, Markus.
And thanks for a great ressource!
Regards,
Stephan
Am 28.11.2010, 19:11 Uhr, schrieb Markus Lutz :
Hello Stephan,
unfortunately the edition of the Weiss complete works still hadn't been
finished at the time Richard Stone published his rec
Hello Stephan,
unfortunately the edition of the Weiss complete works still hadn't been
finished at the time Richard Stone published his reconstruction.
So some of the numbers were preliminary and had to be changed due to
other editorial choices.
On the Weiss site you find the current numberi
tc): I think it
more likely that no keyboard was expected (compare with extant trios
for lute, violin basso)
MH
--- On Sun, 28/11/10, Stephan Olbertz wrote:
From: Stephan Olbertz
Subject: [BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: Weiss duets for lute and harpsichord
To: "baroque-lute@c
rom: Stephan Olbertz
Subject: [BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: Weiss duets for lute and harpsichord
To: "baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu"
Date: Sunday, 28 November, 2010, 9:29
Am 22.11.2010, 13:49 Uhr, schrieb Nicolas Valencia
<[1]nivalenl...@gmail.com>:
>Dear all,
Am 22.11.2010, 13:49 Uhr, schrieb Nicolás Valencia :
Dear all,
According to Richard Stone's article, "Weiss's Concerted Music: A
Catalogue with Commentary", published in the latest LSA Journal, some
duets by Weiss include alternate instrumentations, i.e. lute & flute,
lute & lut
In my oppinion they are misinterpreted alternative double-parts for flute
or violin and cello. The information is added by a later hand to the MS,
very pale for SC 54 and 59, almost invisible for SC 56, at least in my
copy of Dresden (Erbe deutscher Musik). You find that also in
Lauffenstei
