[BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: how (art)historians look at things

2006-07-04 Thread David Rastall
On Jul 4, 2006, at 7:41 PM, Roman Turovsky wrote: >> why, you are playing the lute yourself. Wuddaya mean, can or >> cannot do? >> -- > I am interested in others' opinions, because I believe it can do > less than > it would be expected of it. > RT I guess that depends what's expected of it.

[BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: how (art)historians look at things

2006-07-04 Thread Dale Young
Got it. Thanks. Dale - Original Message - From: "Roman Turovsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Dale Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'baroque Lutelist'" Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2006 7:47 PM Subject: [BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: how (art)historia

[BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: how (art)historians look at things

2006-07-04 Thread Roman Turovsky
man Turovsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Gesendet: Montag, 3. Juli 2006 18:39 >> An: "Mathias Rösel"; baroque Lutelist >> Betreff: [BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: how (art)historians look at things >> And if indeed yes, why would we talk about such minor figures as Bach >&

[BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: how (art)historians look at things

2006-07-04 Thread Roman Turovsky
> "Roman Turovsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: >> In recent monthe I have received requiest from 2 separate composers who >> are >> interested in baroque lute as a medium, but know nothing on the subject. >> Would our Collective Wisdom have any interesting angles, to shed light on >> the things b

[BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: how (art)historians look at things

2006-07-03 Thread Dale Young
rovsky'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'"Mathias Rösel"'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'baroque Lutelist'" Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 5:36 PM Subject: [BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: how (art)historians look at things > Good joke!! > > You know