Re: [Barry-devel] Testing needed for upcoming version 0.17

2011-01-17 Thread Chris Frey
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 11:16:17PM -0700, Nathanael Noblet wrote: > If my hunch is correct, we would request some id from the udev folk (or > piggy back on the ID_PDA) and remove the ACL_MANAGE and change it to > ENV{ID_PDA}="1", setting it to that means that the tag is invoked and the > ACL is man

Re: [Barry-devel] Testing needed for upcoming version 0.17

2011-01-17 Thread Nathanael Noblet
Okay, so I have a theory... I have no idea where the ID_PDA comes from so based on that and what I can observe, it exists in two places, 69-pilot-link.rules <== owned by gnome-pilot-link for pda syncing - just sets the environment variable when matching a hardware id 70-acl.rules <== o

Re: [Barry-devel] Testing needed for upcoming version 0.17

2011-01-17 Thread Nathanael Noblet
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 10:43 PM, Nathanael Noblet < [email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Chris Frey wrote: >> >> Hi Nathanael, >> >> Thanks for sticking with this bug, and handling the web side of things >> for me. >> >> The 69-blackberry.rules file that is in

Re: [Barry-devel] Testing needed for upcoming version 0.17

2011-01-17 Thread Nathanael Noblet
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Chris Frey wrote: > > Hi Nathanael, > > Thanks for sticking with this bug, and handling the web side of things > for me. > > The 69-blackberry.rules file that is in git does not do any permissions > stuff by itself. Instead, it sets the ACL_MANAGE flag, which is s

Re: [Barry-devel] Opensync-plugin and GUI build failure.

2011-01-17 Thread Chris Frey
Hi Phill, That's interesting output... comparing that with the output I see on my machine, it almost looks like autoconf's configure is now sending PKG_CONFIG_PATH on the sub-directory configure command line, instead of relying on the environment. Please give the latest git tree a try. I've chan

Re: [Barry-devel] Compiling opensync-plugin-4x on Debian

2011-01-17 Thread Chris Frey
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 09:56:20PM -0600, Michael Crider wrote: > Is it possible to build opensync-plugin-4x on Debian Sid/Ubuntu Maverick > using the libopensync1exp7(-dev) from the repositories rather than > compiling opensync yourself? I have these packages installed, and have > downloaded th

Re: [Barry-devel] Testing needed for upcoming version 0.17

2011-01-17 Thread Chris Frey
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 01:03:39PM -0700, Nathanael Noblet wrote: > On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Chris Frey wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 04:21:08PM -0700, Nathanael Noblet wrote: > > > I can wrangle up some comments from the fedora/udev people. The really > > odd > > > thing about the

Re: [Barry-devel] Testing needed for upcoming version 0.17

2011-01-17 Thread Nathanael Noblet
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Chris Frey wrote: > On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 04:21:08PM -0700, Nathanael Noblet wrote: > > I can wrangle up some comments from the fedora/udev people. The really > odd > > thing about the bug is that I can sync my pearl fine. > > In that case, you might want to ask