Hi All,
First of all: a superb feature! Editing text files in BASE is extremely
useful for fixing batch import sheets. It saves a lot of time spent on
uploading new versions of sheets after each single fix. Great job!
I discovered that it has an 8kb limitation though. One can open or paste
a t
There is a hard-coded limit of 100kb. Files larger than that can't be
edited online. I just tried to edit a 92kb file and it worked without
problems. Maybe it is a browser limitation? I checked with Firefox 3.0.14
and IE 8. In any case, I think we may have to check on the server-side that
the expec
I just tested it again (FF3.5.3). Here is how to reproduce:
- upload a text file which is larger then 8kb
- memorize file's size
- edit file removing one character only
- check the size again
In my case removing one character from ~40kb file shrank the file to 24kb.
Pawel
Nicklas Nordborg wrote:
Pawel Sztromwasser wrote:
> I just tested it again (FF3.5.3). Here is how to reproduce:
> - upload a text file which is larger then 8kb
> - memorize file's size
> - edit file removing one character only
> - check the size again
>
> In my case removing one character from ~40kb file shrank the file
I can confirm Pawels problem. I run Firefox 3.5.3 on Mac OS X 10.6.1
(Snowleopard).
My 63k file is now only 32k.
Jari
Nicklas Nordborg wrote:
> Pawel Sztromwasser wrote:
>> I just tested it again (FF3.5.3). Here is how to reproduce:
>> - upload a text file which is larger then 8kb
>> - memori
Jari Häkkinen wrote:
> I can confirm Pawels problem. I run Firefox 3.5.3 on Mac OS X 10.6.1
> (Snowleopard).
>
> My 63k file is now only 32k.
One more question. Is the data lost when loading the file or when saving
the file?
I tried it on our old Mac (10.5.8) here. Works fine but it is running
Ok, then it is not installation specific.
(I missed your email when sending mine)
Pawel
Jari Häkkinen wrote:
> I can confirm Pawels problem. I run Firefox 3.5.3 on Mac OS X 10.6.1
> (Snowleopard).
>
> My 63k file is now only 32k.
>
>
> Jari
>
>
> Nicklas Nordborg wrote:
>
>> Pawel Sztromwasse
Jari Häkkinen wrote:
> I can confirm Pawels problem. I run Firefox 3.5.3 on Mac OS X 10.6.1
> (Snowleopard).
>
> My 63k file is now only 32k.
And redoing edit saves a 16k file, redoing the edit saves a 8k file, and
another edit will not halve the size but a 7.99k file is saved.
Jari
--
Saving the file after editing: does not matter if enlarging or shrining
editions.
When pasting in text that would make a file bigger than 8kb, we have
seen the problem as well (only after clicking save button of course).
Pawel
Nicklas Nordborg wrote:
> Jari Häkkinen wrote:
>
>> I can confirm
Strange... I tested it on Windows as well (XP SP3). Could it be
installation specific?
Our config is:
Version BASE 2.12.1 (build #4972; schema #72)
Web server Apache Tomcat/6.0.16
Database Server PostgreSQL 8.3.8
Database Dialectorg.hibernate.dialect.PostgreSQLDialect
The file has correct size in the edit window. I copy pasted it to my
local editor, except for some formatting issues the content is correct.
The file is truncated at save time.
Jari
Nicklas Nordborg wrote:
> Jari Häkkinen wrote:
>> I can confirm Pawels problem. I run Firefox 3.5.3 on Mac OS X
I have added a ticket for this: http://base.thep.lu.se/ticket/1393
If anyone comes up with new information please post it there.
/Nicklas
Jari Häkkinen wrote:
> Jari Häkkinen wrote:
>> I can confirm Pawels problem. I run Firefox 3.5.3 on Mac OS X 10.6.1
>> (Snowleopard).
>>
>> My 63k file is now
I downloaded and installed Tomcat 6.0.16 and got the same problem. It works
with Tomcat 6.0.20.
/Nicklas
Pawel Sztromwasser wrote:
> Strange... I tested it on Windows as well (XP SP3). Could it be
> installation specific?
> Our config is:
> Version BASE 2.12.1 (build #4972; schema #72)
> W
Nicklas Nordborg wrote:
> I downloaded and installed Tomcat 6.0.16 and got the same problem. It works
> with Tomcat 6.0.20.
And our production server runs 6.0.16. So, it is time to upgrade.
Jari
--
Come build with us!
OK. Great thanks for solving this!
Pawel
Jari Häkkinen wrote:
> Nicklas Nordborg wrote:
>> I downloaded and installed Tomcat 6.0.16 and got the same problem. It works
>> with Tomcat 6.0.20.
>
> And our production server runs 6.0.16. So, it is time to upgrade.
>
>
> Jari
>
>
> ---
15 matches
Mail list logo