Re: [basex-talk] small issue with map:put()

Hi Dirk, I have to ask this: What is the fun of the function-arity to be a part of its identification. Which means that a property is part of an identification. - Rob -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Dirk Kirsten [mailto:d...@basex.org] Verzonden: donderdag 20 november 2014 11:14 Aan: Rob

Re: [basex-talk] small issue with map:put()

Hi Rob, to be honest; I don't know. It is part of the XQuery 3.0 spec and I am sure the wise people who have written this spec have a reason to do so. I can think of a number of reasons to always include it: - obviously, you will need it for some functions to identify them , because you could

Re: [basex-talk] small issue with map:put()

Hi Dirk, Hmm. Thanks for the reply ( I didn't say: answer ;-) - Rob -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Dirk Kirsten [mailto:d...@basex.org] Verzonden: vrijdag 21 november 2014 10:02 Aan: Rob Stapper CC: 'BaseX' Onderwerp: Re: [basex-talk] small issue with map:put() Hi Rob, to be honest; I

Re: [basex-talk] small issue with map:put()

I think that Dirk has summarized pretty well why the arity is required. XQuery is both a strongly and weakly typed language: If the return type is known at compile time, the query optimizer can benefit a lot from type information. If XML data without schema information is processed, however, all

Re: [basex-talk] Distributed processing on roadmap ?

Hi Mansi, The other day, I came across this work [1] [2] by Darin McBeath that may be of interest. It use Apache Spark [3] with Saxon. In principle it looks like one could build something similar using the BaseX jar in place of Saxon. /Andy [1] https://github.com/elsevierlabs/spark-xml-utils

Re: [basex-talk] Distributed processing on roadmap ?

Hi Mansi, I was busy preparing a presentation for my company as baseX being a our analytics solution. It was very well received. Nice to hear! […] map/reduce […] If the querying and processing step could use processing power from clusters of nodes, may be we might get significant

[basex-talk] BaseX outputting php segments as comment nodes.

Hi, I am trying to output some html that have php instructions, and the instructions keep showing as comments. For example: body ?php include 'footer/index.html'; ? /body Show up as: body!--?php include 'footer/index.html';--/body Example: *declare*

Re: [basex-talk] BaseX outputting php segments as comment nodes.

Hi France, Once again, I only tried the latest snapshot. This is what I get: curl http://localhost:8984/cms/ehtml2html5; !DOCTYPE html body ?php include 'footer/index.html'; /body Could you try and see if using 8.0 makes a difference? Thanks, Christian On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 10:49 PM,

[basex-talk] Reg : Collection Creation For Huge XML

Dear Team We are adding the 4gb xml file to the collection,while adding the file we are getting the out of main memory.My java application has the 4gb memory.Can you please help me on this.We are using the LocalSession for creating the collection. ThanksRegards