, August 31, 2020 2:38 PM
To: RobStapper
Cc: basex-talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de
Subject: Re: [basex-talk] ancestor axis i.c.w. fetched XML issue
Hey Rob, hallo Hans-Jürgen,
I have completely revised the traversal of mixed database/fragment nodes for
the ancestor and preceding/following axes. In some
gt;> Windows 10
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *Christian Grün
>> *Sent: *Wednesday, August 26, 2020 6:21 PM
>> *To: *RobStapper
>> *Cc: *basex-talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de
>> *Subject: *Re: [basex-talk] ancestor axis i.c.w. fetched XML issue
>>
>>
{}#yiv1151269877
Bummer. I don’t see a work around either.
Rob.
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Christian Grün
Sent: Monday, August 31, 2020 9:22 AM
To: RobStapper
Cc: basex-talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de
Subject: Re: [basex-talk] ancestor axis i.c.w. fetched XML issue
Seems
Bummer. I don’t see a work around either.
Rob.
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Christian Grün
Sent: Monday, August 31, 2020 9:22 AM
To: RobStapper
Cc: basex-talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de
Subject: Re: [basex-talk] ancestor axis i.c.w. fetched XML issue
Seems you’ve stumbled upon a classic [1
>
>
>
> Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for
> Windows 10
>
>
>
> *From: *Christian Grün
> *Sent: *Wednesday, August 26, 2020 6:21 PM
> *To: *RobStapper
> *Cc: *basex-talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de
> *Subject: *Re: [basex
: RobStapper
Cc: basex-talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de
Subject: Re: [basex-talk] ancestor axis i.c.w. fetched XML issue
Hi Rob,
An interesting one. The mixing of external nodes and node fragments (which have
different internal representations) caused some confusion.
The issue has been fixed, a new
Hi Cristian,
😉 😊 😊 Issue solved. That’s why I have so much confidence in BaseX and it’s team.
thnx,
Rob
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Christian Grün
Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2020 6:21 PM
To: RobStapper
Cc: basex-talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de
Subject: Re: [basex-talk] ancestor axis
Hi Rob,
An interesting one. The mixing of external nodes and node fragments (which
have different internal representations) caused some confusion.
The issue has been fixed, a new snapshot is ready to go [1].
All the best, hope you are fine,
Christian
[1] https://files.basex.org/releases/latest/
Hi Christian,
I encountered some inconsistency when using an fetched XML-node in combination
with xpath’s ancestor-axis.
I attached a small snippet. I expect an ancestor here.
It works alright if the XML-node is not fetched from a document or in case of
the parent-axis.
Best Regards,
Rob Sta
9 matches
Mail list logo