On 2012-04-21 18:41, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> Still, I don't see the point in avoiding 'git_complete' and making our
> lifes more difficult.
I'm not aware of ways it'd make people's lifes more difficult, but if
git_complete is a function intended for completion purposes, I'd
personally not name
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On 2012-04-16 23:59, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>
>> Hopefully this information helps clarify to what extent the leading
>> underscores in functions exposed by completion scripts are meant or
>> are not meant as a convention.
>
> We've discussed
On 2012-04-16 11:16, Paul Wise wrote:
> AFAICT the completion for ls misses the --full-time option:
It does indeed. The line where --full-time is in --help output trips
our _longopt function:
$ echo "--full-timelike -l --time-style=full-iso" \
| sed -ne 's/.*\(--[-A-Za-z0-9]\{1,\}=\
On 2012-04-03 23:40, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> While reviewing a leftover completion in mageia postfix package, I found
> we already have a postconf completion in completions/postconf. However,
> I think its content is uselessly complex, and could be simplified with
> the attached patch. Unless
On 2012-04-16 23:59, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Hopefully this information helps clarify to what extent the leading
> underscores in functions exposed by completion scripts are meant or
> are not meant as a convention.
We've discussed what a real "API" or "namespace" of bash-completion
would look l
Bugs item #313480, was changed at 2011-12-26 17:38 by Ville Skyttä
You can respond by visiting:
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=413095&aid=313480&group_id=100114
Status: Open
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Ville Skyttä (scop-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: _filedir a$b
