Re: [Bash-completion-devel] speed up bash completion init by > 30%...

2014-10-13 Thread Ville Skyttä
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 6:09 AM, Linda A. Walsh wrote: > Currently this function is used all over the place: > > #have() { unset -v have > ## Completions for system administrator commands are installed as well > in > ## case completion is attempted via `sudo command ...'. > #PATH=$PATH:

Re: [Bash-completion-devel] Bug#764800: spurious function in bash-completion causes >30% performance degradation (and is bug'ed)

2014-10-13 Thread Ville Skyttä
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 11:25 PM, Linda A. Walsh wrote: > Ville Skyttä wrote: >> >> See comments in bash_completion next to the definition of the >> function. Due to its deprecated status it is not likely to be changed >> any more, especially in ways that would change its behavior (e.g. the >> "ty

Re: [Bash-completion-devel] Bug#764800: spurious function in bash-completion causes >30% performance degradation (and is bug'ed)

2014-10-13 Thread Linda A. Walsh
Ville Skyttä wrote: See comments in bash_completion next to the definition of the function. Due to its deprecated status it is not likely to be changed any more, especially in ways that would change its behavior (e.g. the "type -P" case). The function is not used by bash-completion itself at al

[Bash-completion-devel] Bug#764800: Bug#764800: spurious function in bash-completion causes >30% performance degradation (and is bug'ed)

2014-10-13 Thread Ville Skyttä
See comments in bash_completion next to the definition of the function. Due to its deprecated status it is not likely to be changed any more, especially in ways that would change its behavior (e.g. the "type -P" case). The function is not used by bash-completion itself at all, and 3rd party comple