Hello!
Thomas E Deweese wrote:
>
> You might also try getting the source distribution and building it
> from scratch (it's fairly easy to do as long as you have the JDK).
I've tried this and I can now get Squiggle up and running. Thanks!
Right now that's enough for me. I really wished I
> "JI" == Jakob Ilves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JI> Hello! I've read the FAQ and tried my best to search for an
JI> answer on the mailing list.
JI> I've downloaded Batik 1.5beta4b and unpacked it using jar.exe
JI> (from Sun JDK 1.4.0_02). When I try to start the program using
JI> java -j
s to local resources.
Jan
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Gerard BUNEL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Freitag, 21. Februar 2003 15:04
An: Batik Users
Betreff: Re: java.Security.AccessControlException when starting
Batik-Squiggle
Which is normal as extension jar files must be signed
Ge
Which is normal as extension jar files must be signed
Gerard BUNEL
"G. Wade Johnson" a écrit :
> I had a similar problem recently that was caused by putting the batik library
> files in the JRE extension directory. I could solve it by either removing the
> library files from that directory or by
I had a similar problem recently that was caused by putting the batik library
files in the JRE extension directory. I could solve it by either removing the
library files from that directory or by putting the squiggle jar file in the
directory.
Check the mailing list archives for a message from me
