Recently, Mats wrote:
Deleting selectively from the *BBDB* buffer is too
slow. Editing the bbdb-file has not been recommended in the
past but deleting complete entries might be failsafe?
What interests me about this whole discussion is the underlying
assumption that ther
I'm using BBDB version 1.49; 1-dec-93.
Apologies if this isn't the right list for bug reports. I didn't see
anything else mentioned in the info files.
The bbdb-insinuate-vm function doesn't seem to interact properly with
the autoloading present in VM 5.50. That function tries to overload
vm-
Here's another item you might want to know about someone... their WWW
home page. Put that information in a field called "www", and this
function will provide the connection to the wonderful emacs w3-mode
(ie, hit W to go to the page, or *W to visit several at once).
Bng
(define-key bbdb-mode-m
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I always do bbdb-changed before saving.
> My bbdb has 2500+ entries (400K).
2584.
Every few months I do M-x bbdb-notes ^$ and nuke anyone who doesn't look
interesting. Yeah, it takes forever. Knowing how hard it would be to
speed it up has made me a patient guy.
I always do bbdb-changed before saving.
My bbdb has 2500+ entries (400K).
To make bbdb more useful,
I think we need a way to easily trade sets of entries with other people.
(Do you have any intelligence to report?)
Also, removing the bbdb from emacs and putting it into it's own process.
A net in
