Alex Schroeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The issue is still undecided. A long time ago I wrote up a patch that
> transformed all zip codes into strings and did away with all the
> datastructure cruft that is used to validate zip codes. Since the zip
> codes were saved as plain text strings,
I took a totally different approach; I decided that I wanted someone in my
bbdb if I replied to their email. So, as a gnus user, I did this:
(defun pdf-bbdb/gnus-force-create ()
"Add bbdb entry for this message."
(interactive)
(let ((bbdb/news-auto-create-p t))
(bbdb/gnus-pop-up-bbdb-
Well thanks everyone for the responses. Nix, I'll wait for your
generically kludgy machinery to play with the additional bbdb fields,
(I'll be eagerly monitoring gnu.emacs.sources :)) and I'll take a look
at whether I can stand pressing : in gnus to manually add a record.
However, something tell
I don't disagree. It was just that given the original poster's
complaint, it appeared to me that he was looking at bbdb as more of an
address book.
--
Dave Goldberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
bbdb-info mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (David S. Goldberg) writes:
> Ask yourself: "of all the addresses I am automatically snarfing, what
> percentage do I really want to keep?" If that number is low, then
> turn off automatic snarfing of addresses and just add the ones you
> want by hand (in gnus type a colon (:)
>> I have been using the bbdb for about two months now and I feel like
>> I am using it wrong. I spend all my time tweaking the
>> bbdb-ignore-some-messages-alist for email addresses I don't want
>> noticed, to protect them from being automatically added (I have
>> that turned on for gnus mail gr
A few days ago I decided to take modify an existing address display
function. And I started wondering about the zip codes again.
The issue is still undecided. A long time ago I wrote up a patch that
transformed all zip codes into strings and did away with all the
datastructure cruft that is use
The docstring for `bbdb-notice-hook' states
,
| Also note that bbdb-change-hook will NOT be called as a result of any
| modifications you may make to the record inside this hook.
`
As far as I can see, this is incorrect. It *should* be correct, because
it is very annoying to have the cha
Nix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>the notice hook gets called a
> lot --- e.g., when updating records, as well as when looking at them,
No, it doesn't. Oops. (It even explicitly mentions that case in the
docstring.)
--
`Normally, we don't do people's
> I have been using the bbdb for about two months now and I feel like I
> am using it wrong. I spend all my time tweaking the
> bbdb-ignore-some-messages-alist for email addresses I don't want
> noticed, to protect them from being automatically added (I have that
> turned on for gnus mail groups)
Benjamin Rutt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have been using the bbdb for about two months now and I feel like I
> am using it wrong. I spend all my time tweaking the
> bbdb-ignore-some-messages-alist for email addresses I don't want
> noticed, to protect them from being automatically added (I
I have been using the bbdb for about two months now and I feel like I
am using it wrong. I spend all my time tweaking the
bbdb-ignore-some-messages-alist for email addresses I don't want
noticed, to protect them from being automatically added (I have that
turned on for gnus mail groups). I also
12 matches
Mail list logo
