The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to gnu.emacs.sources as well.
This is a new version of the BBDB expiry hack `expire-bbdb.el'.
Changes:
- Renamed to `bbdb-expire.el' to be more in keeping with the way BBDB and
Emacs packages are normally named, and
Today, Doug Alcorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What would keep "us" (read "the people who develop bbdb") from
implementing a more orthogonal schema in a flat file? I agree with
the other two posts about not using either RDBM or something like
Berkley db files. It is just too much hastle to
"John" == John Hunter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John Many moons ago, I posted:
John From: John Hunter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
John Subject: GCC-ing to my gnus nnml outgoing archive with 'm'?
John To: mailing-list BBDB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
John Date: 28 Feb 2000 19:39:56 -0600
"APA" == Adrian Aichner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Let me know if I have misread the import of your email, but I do not
have a problem setting the variable to 'bbdb-send-mail-style' to
'message. The problem is that this does not do what I need it to do,
that is to use the GCC feature that I get
"RW" == Ronan Waide [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
RW On October 28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Any thoughts? If this isn't appropriate discussion here, let me know.
RW My stand on this would be no, no, no. Really. No. BBDB works quite
RW nicely, with vast quantities of entries,
