BBDB 2.2 released

2001-01-24 Thread Ronan Waide
Okay, I've offically nailed BBDB-2.2 in CVS. Release notes, freshmeat uploads, website changes, etc. are still in progress, but... since I tagged it just before midnight, it's exactly two years after the last BBDB release, which is the deadline I've been unofficially trying to hit. Release note

Re: Bug report

2001-01-24 Thread Ronan Waide
On January 14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > (ps - the docs say info-bbdb, not bbdb-info...) Only in historically significant (!) places, as far as I can see... Cheers, Waider. Do correct me if I'm wrong. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] / Yes, it /is/ very personal of me. I really need to reinstate the witty

Re: tab completion for mail-aliases

2001-01-24 Thread Albert L. Ting
Actually, looks like a simple modification to bbdb-com.el. This patch will optionally allow mail-alias expansion during bbdb-complete-name. RCS file: /cvsroot/bbdb/bbdb/lisp/bbdb-com.el,v retrieving revision 1.90 diff -c -C0 -r1.90 bbdb-com.el *** bbdb-com.el 2001/01/24 02:07:18 1.90 --- bb

Re: tab completion for mail-aliases

2001-01-24 Thread David S. Goldberg
I use eudc since I search both ldap and bbdb, but I bet the same sort of advice could be applied directly to bbdb-complete-name: (defadvice eudc-expand-inline (around check-aliases-too activate) "If eudc-expand-inline doesn't find a match, check for a match in mail-aliases." (condition-case n

tab completion for mail-aliases

2001-01-24 Thread Albert L. Ting
Is there a way to make bbdb-complete-name also do expand-abbrev on mail-aliases? Seems like I have hit CR or SP instead. ___ bbdb-info mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info

Re: bbdb-load-touchtones

2001-01-24 Thread Didier Verna
Ronan Waide wrote: > Okay, I've patched this. I don't think it should fatal-error on this, > either, just warn you, sit-for, and continue on its way. FITNR, as > they say. Yup. There are other things that would need to be improved in the sound code. For instance, under XEmacs with sound

Re: [Q] annoyances with CVS

2001-01-24 Thread Didier Verna
Nix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is a client issue, not a server-side one. (Rare, really; most of > the annoyances I get with CVS crop up on the server, where mortals > cannot fix them. I've never had any problems with the BBDB repository, > though.) OK, I had done this before, but