On 05 Feb 2001 11:04:27 +0100, Didier Verna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I can't reproduce this. It seems that you have a
> reachable vm-version.el file somewhere in your path. Can you
> check this ?
How interesting. I did, in fact ... but I had *all* of vm, not just
vm-versio
I'm converting my .mailrc to BBDB. I have many groups of aliases like
this:
alias Abe ...
alias Bill ...
alias brothers Abe Bill
alias Cathy ...
alias Deb ...
alias sisters Cathy Deb
alias siblings brothers sisters
"mail-alias" seems the right BBDB way often enough, but if my ori
I've found a serious bug in BBDB version 2.2 ($Date: 2001/01/24
23:14:00 $) - it seems to be getting completion wrong. Using either a
version 5 or version 6 database with the following single entry:
foo fum
net: foo@baz, oldfoo@bar
timestamp: 05 Feb 2001
and bbdb-completion-t
On Sunday, February 4 2001 05:03:59, Michael Harnois wrote:
[...]
> isn't quite true, as the current cvs (and for the past week or so)
> won't build at all if vm isn't installed:
[...]
I have modified Makefile.in, it should work now.
Try the new version in CVS ...
Bye Robert
___
On Sunday, February 4 2001 00:14:17, Alex Schroeder wrote:
> The latest CVS seems to have an XEmacsism... The function
> replace-in-string is not in Emacs 20.7.
Fixed in the current CVS.
Cheers Robert
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.ne
Michael Harnois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Apparently the comment
>
> # this is lovely, isn't it? Surprisingly enough, it seems to work...
>
> isn't quite true, as the current cvs (and for the past week or so)
> won't build at all if vm isn't installed:
>
> ===[root] /usr/local/src/bbdb # m
Alex Schroeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The latest CVS seems to have an XEmacsism... The function
> replace-in-string is not in Emacs 20.7.
Well, there is compatibility code in bbdb-snarf, so maybe this should
be moved from bbdb-snarf.el to bbdb.el (where the offending
replace-in-string re
Robert Fenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Saturday, February 3 2001 02:30:26, Gerd Boerrigter wrote:
> [...]
> > You actually can do that. Use 'bbdb-create' to create a new record.
> > It can have the same name. Sadly you need to type that yourself.
> > Great would be something like: 'Would