> Thomas DeWeese writes:
>> 3) It always does a full sync, rather than a fast sync. This
>> is true whether I use SyncBBDB as a PilotManager conduit or use
>> bootstrap from the command line (which I prefer).
>> 4) Running from the command line (bootstrap) runs fine, but
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to gnu.emacs.gnus as well.
Just wondering, before re-inventing, if anyone had written lisp to read vcards
from an (gnus) e-mail into bbdb. (Not talking about syncing to a palm,
replacing bbdb, etc., just a one-way input
On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Ronan Waide wrote:
> Wow. If I'd known you simply wanted it to stop noticing anything,
> I'd've told you to read the manual ages ago!
I think what Harry really wants is to have two entries in his BBDB:
Harry Putnam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> his own entry
Harry Putnam <[EMAI
On February 14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Hmm, I'll look into this. Unfortunately, I suspect that something will
> only accept "" and not 'nil'. Which means I'll need to seriously uglify
> (TM) the code to what wants what :(
If this is the case, let me know, and I'll see about patching BBDB. I
On February 14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> (setq bbdb/mail-auto-create-p nil) ... he he
> (setq bbdb/news-auto-create-p nil) ... he he he
> (setq bbdb-always-add-addresses 'never) ... he he he he,
>
Wow. If I'd known you simply wanted it to stop noticing anything,
I'd've told you to read th
On February 14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> so, what's the situation for us users/whiners/non-coders?
>
There will be another release, perhaps towards the end of the month. I
may well call it 2.4, since going with a three-part version number -
especially when I'm not even doing it properly - se
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kai Großjohann) writes:
> > i haven't used CVS and i'd prefer not to learn all about it just
> > to fix my bbdb problems. however, if that's how this project is
> > going to be managed, then i guess it's time to learn something new
> > (the horror! the horror!).
>
> Don't be a
On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, patrick finerty, Jr. wrote:
> there have been a fair number of problems that have been found in
> the latest 'official' release of bbdb. as such, i'm wondering if
> there are plans for an incremental release.
Hm, if you're talking about the 2.2 release, then indeed there is