On January 18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I would have though this would have been biting everyone, but I don't
see it in the archive... and might have missed it on the list.
Between BBDB 2.32 and 2.34 the following change was made to
bbdb-sc.el.
Thanks. Fixed in CVS. For now you'll have to
On January 18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The new release still fails to build properly if you don't have the VM
sources where emacs can find them, even if you ./configure --disable-vm:
/local/project/bbdb/lisp/bbdb-vm.el: error: file error ((Cannot
open load file vm-autoload))
Hmm. I'd not
On January 18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
bbdb-print-elide still appears in the texinfo documentation and the
comments in bbdb-print.el. Global substitution time in both files?
Is it worth using make-obsolete-variable when this sort of change
happens?
Thanks...
peace happiness,
martin
Hi,
I just started using bbdb a couple of weeks ago; thanks for
everyone's efforts I think it's excellent.
There seems to be a really minor display bug in 2.34. The following
temp fix seems to work for me - no promises bearing in mind that I'm
just learning elisp, bbdb (and for that matter
Ronan Waide [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Much display handling rewriting, courtesy of Alex Schroeder and
Robert Fenk. It's so good, I've not even figured it out myself yet.
Heh. I can't remember contributing any towards it, I assume you meant
somebody else. I have something to discuss,
On Friday Jan 18, 2002, Robert Fenk wrote:
On Tuesday, January 8, 2002 at 20:32:08, Galen Boyer wrote:
If I have a few records showing in my BBDB, is there anyway to
make the visible records remain while I search for a different
string. The resulting bbdb buffer would be a union of the
On Tuesday, January 8, 2002 at 20:32:08, Galen Boyer wrote:
If I have a few records showing in my BBDB, is there anyway to
make the visible records remain while I search for a different
string. The resulting bbdb buffer would be a union of the
records from the anchored buffer and the just
