Migration code assumes raw notes are always alists

2002-08-19 Thread Jim Blandy
(I posted this patch to the sourceforge site (it's request ID 597322), but it doesn't seem like people are using that facility.) 2002-08-19 Jim Blandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] * lisp/bbdb-migrate.el (bbdb-migrate-change-dates, bbdb-unmigrate-change-dates): The raw notes field isn't

Re: Migration code assumes raw notes are always alists

2002-08-19 Thread Ronan Waide
On August 19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: (I posted this patch to the sourceforge site (it's request ID 597322), but it doesn't seem like people are using that facility.) Yes, that's correct; I find the thing to be pretty unusable (I'm not on a particularly broadbandish connection) so I prefer

Completion code tries to downcase nil

2002-08-19 Thread Jim Blandy
This bug showed up in the presence of the following two records: [nil nil nil nil nil nil ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) nil nil] [GDB Local nil nil nil nil ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) nil nil] when I tried to complete `gdb-loca'. 2002-08-19 Jim Blandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] * lisp/bbdb-com.el

Re: Migration code assumes raw notes are always alists

2002-08-19 Thread Jochen Küpper
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002 23:41:26 +0100 Ronan Waide wrote: Ronan On August 19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: (I posted this patch to the sourceforge site (it's request ID 597322), but it doesn't seem like people are using that facility.) Ronan Yes, that's correct; I find the thing to be pretty

ÆóÒµÍøÕ¾ Ãâ·ÑÊÔÓÃ

2002-08-19 Thread Öйú×ÔÖúÍø
ÒÔÇ°ÆóÒµ½¨ÍøÕ¾£¬ÐèÒªÇëÈËÖÆ×÷¡£²»µ«Ê±¼ä³¤¡¢Âé·³¶à¡¢¼Û¸ñ¸ß£¬ÈÕºóÐèÒªÇëÈËά»¤ÍøÕ¾£¬·Ç³£Âé·³£¡ ÏÖÔÚºÃÁË£¬Äú¿ÉÒÔͨ¹ý¡°×ÔÖúÆóÒµÍøվϵͳ¡±·½±ãµØ½¨Á¢ÍøÕ¾£»180ÖÖÍøÒ³Éè¼ÆÄ£°æÈÎÒâÌôÑ¡£¬Ç¿´óµÄÍøÕ¾¹ÜÀíϵͳ£¬Ö»Òª»á´ò×Ö£¬¾Í¿ÉËæʱ¹ÜÀíÍøÕ¾ÄÚÈÝ£¡ ÏÖÔÚÉêÇë,Ãâ·ÑÊÔÓà ÍøÖ·: