Roland Winkler writes:
> I extended (and fixed) this patch to inherit from special-mode.
> Now bbdb-mode is also derived from special-mode.
Note that Emacs v22 doesn't have special-mode, so this change will make
it break on that version (or earlier, of course).
-David
--
Two many changes today. I lost track!
2011-04-16 Roland Winkler
* lisp/bbdb.el (bbdb-create-hook, bbdb-change-hook): Use defvar.
--
Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload
Consolidatio
On Sun Apr 17 2011 Nix wrote:
> We could do the same job with a new hook which is called only once per
> record, no matter how many times it is spotted by a given call to
> bbdb-update-records, or with a new guarantee that the bbdb-notice-hook
> would only fire once per record per call to bbdb-upda
On 17 Apr 2011, Roland Winkler stated:
> On Sun Apr 17 2011 Nix wrote:
>> >> (I'll also see if bbdb-expire works with v3.0x and make it work if
>> >> it doesn't.)
>> >
>> > I believe this was some kind of add-on for BBDB.
>>
>> It was, making heavy use of advisements to do its job. If it isn't
>>
On Sun Apr 17 2011 Nix wrote:
> >> (I'll also see if bbdb-expire works with v3.0x and make it work if
> >> it doesn't.)
> >
> > I believe this was some kind of add-on for BBDB.
>
> It was, making heavy use of advisements to do its job. If it isn't
> broken I'd be astonished. :)
If possible, I'd l
On Thu Apr 14 2011 David Engster wrote:
> I shortly tested compilation, and it works more or less fine for GNU
> Emacs22 to the latest GNU emacs-snapshot.
>
> XEmacs is another matter, though. I attached the current logs for XEmacs
> 21.4 and 21.5. Note that your 'PUSHPATH' eval doesn't work for X
On 17 Apr 2011, Roland Winkler told this:
> On Mon Apr 11 2011 Nix wrote:
>> (I'll also see if bbdb-expire works with v3.0x and make it work if
>> it doesn't.)
>
> I believe this was some kind of add-on for BBDB.
It was, making heavy use of advisements to do its job. If it isn't
broken I'd be ast
On Mon Apr 11 2011 Nix wrote:
> On 11 Apr 2011, Roland Winkler told this:
> > - Finally, I fixed various bugs and improved the documentation.
>
> I just noticed that BBDB development has restarted. Unfortunately
> BBDB 3.0 has removed a good few features, including one I definitely
> rely on: bbdb
On Fri Apr 15 2011 Leo wrote:
> When people use add-hook they think they are adding another function to
> a hook so if this isn't the case it will surprise them. People who are
> setting hook to nil is in a different thinking.
There are add-hook and remove-hook. The latter fails (now) if you
want
On Fri Apr 15 2011 Leo wrote:
> I wonder if it makes sense to replace bbdb-defstruct with defstruct?
What benefit(s) would you expect from that? I guess that
bbdb-defstruct is about as efficient and effective as possible for
the needs of BBDB.
Roland
On Fri Apr 15 2011 Leo wrote:
> I personally haven't used this much in Emacs. But since gmail does this
> and I have found it useful at times, I wonder if this feature should be
> part of the bbdb-mua feature set.
I am sorry, it's not clear to me what you want to say here. The new
BBDB treats outg
Several people on this list have started to contribute to the new
BBDB in one or the other way. I am quite happy to see that!
I'd like to outline my view / strategy for that:
I'd be happy to see a proper release of the new BBDB in the not to
far future. To make BBDB really free software, I'd be
I tried to incoprorate a bunch of smaller issues that came up on
this list the past couple of days. Thanks to everyone who
contributed to this in one or the other way.
On Wed Apr 13 2011 Sam Steingold wrote:
> if you do not care about obsolete emacsen, please apply this instead.
I extended (and
I propose the following change that includes the timezone info so that
3rd library does not need to know the time is actually UTC.
diff --git a/lisp/bbdb.el b/lisp/bbdb.el
index d2c72fb9..89e890c3 100644
--- a/lisp/bbdb.el
+++ b/lisp/bbdb.el
@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ (defcustom bbdb-change-hook 'bbdb-t
14 matches
Mail list logo
