On Tue Aug 21 2012 Roland Winkler wrote:
On Tue Aug 21 2012 Leo wrote:
bbdb-record-x tells me it is about extensions. Additionally, fields
contained in x become meaningful, such as bbdb-record-x-uid,
bbdb-record-set-x-uid etc. That is clarify that can not be attained
otherwise. Just some
On 2012-08-26 04:09 +0800, Roland Winkler wrote:
Kind of natural would be `xfield' instead of `x' as a name for the
*list* of extra (custom) fields of a record. Certainly this matches
the lingo that both Leo and I used above.
I am fine with this ;)
Leo
