On Sun Dec 8 2013 Roland Winkler wrote: > Actually, I do not know whether I want to advertise at all the usage > of bbdb-create-internal. I think it is really just a left-over from > bbdb 2, which (to the best of my knowledge) was not used then > either. > > This function promises to perform "a fair amount of error-checking > on the passed in values, so it is safe to call this from other > programs." But when is this really helpful? I cannot imagine any > reasonably clean code calling this function that would need such a > feature and benefit from it.
I have realized that what I said above was not quite correct. The function bbdb-create-internal makes more sense than what I thought. I realized that it is even used once by BBDB 3; and then I had to refresh my memories how the different pieces of code are working together. So the bottom line is that now I am quite convinced that it does make sense for the bbdb vcard interface to use bbdb-create-internal I am currently rather busy with other things. But I wanted to post this clarification anyway. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ bbdb-info@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/
