Ted Zlatanov writes:
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 21:34:15 +0200 David Engster
> wrote:
> DE> XEmacs is another matter, though. I attached the current logs for XEmacs
> DE> 21.4 and 21.5. Note that your 'PUSHPATH' eval doesn't work for XEmacs;
> DE> just use
Roland Winkler writes:
> I extended (and fixed) this patch to inherit from special-mode.
> Now bbdb-mode is also derived from special-mode.
Note that Emacs v22 doesn't have special-mode, so this change will make
it break on that version (or earlier, of course).
-David
--
Ted Zlatanov writes:
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 12:16:58 -0500 "Roland Winkler" wrote:
> RW> My main concern is XEmacs support. While I am not at all opposed to
> RW> having this (re)added to BBDB, it is simply something where I do not
> RW> know about and it ranks low on my personal agenda.
>
> David
In the latest Emacs 32.2 pretest, a require of bbdb-gnus leads to a
buffer popping up saying "save-excursion defeated by set-buffer". This
is due to a defadvice in bbdb-com.el, using the "(save-excursion
(set-buffer ..." construct, which now emits the above warning. This can
be fixed by applying t
