I finally found the problem: bbdb/gnus-split-method returns a pair,
but nnmail-split-fancy expects simply the group. I didn't see this
earlier, because I misinterpreted a trace...
So, I use this function within nnmail-split-fancy:
(defun bbdb/gnus-split-fancy-method ()
"Call bbdb/gnus-split-
>>>>> "Kai" == Kai Großjohann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Kai> On 19 Jul 2001, Martin Gasbichler wrote:
>> Yes, and this is bad. nnmail-split-fancy-with-parent should always
>> have highest precedence (as I assume that the parent was split
>>
>>>>> "Kai" == Kai Großjohann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Kai> On 19 Jul 2001, Martin Gasbichler wrote:
>> Is it just, that bbdb/gnus-split-method is not suitable for
>> nnmail-split-fancy?
Kai> I think so. A cursory look at the code seems to
>>>>> "Kai" == Kai Großjohann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Kai> On 18 Jul 2001, Martin Gasbichler wrote:
>>
>> (setq nnmail-split-fancy
>> '(| (: nnmail-split-fancy-with-parent)
>> (: bbdb/gnus-split-method)
>> ("mail.al
> I just discovered bbdb/gnus-split-method and it's really
> great. However, I have one problem: I'd like to use
> nnmail-split-fancy-with-parent, too.
> So I came up with the following setup:
> (setq bbdb/gnus-split-default-group "mail.all-other")
> (setq nnmail-split-methods 'nnmail-split-fan
Hi,
I just discovered bbdb/gnus-split-method and it's really
great. However, I have one problem: I'd like to use
nnmail-split-fancy-with-parent, too.
So I came up with the following setup:
(setq bbdb/gnus-split-default-group "mail.all-other")
(setq nnmail-split-methods 'nnmail-split-fancy)
(se
