On Sun, 8 Jul 2001, Ronan Waide wrote:
On cursory inspection of the interface, it appears to suffer from
the same problem as mail-extract-address-components, i.e. it doesn't
deal with multiple addresses. I could, of course, be wrong.
Err, did you see that there are two functions,
On July 9, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On July 9, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Err, did you see that there are two functions,
mail-header-parse-address and mail-header-parse-addresses? Just a
sanity check. Or maybe you saw something in the docs that I didn't
see.
No, given the Xemacs
On July 2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
:)
This is so apropos emacs/xemacs... Anyway. I'll check the new
mail-extr with emacs 21 to see if the problems are fixed, and in the
meantime I have that nasty brute-force hack that I posted which
On July 8, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Sat, 7 Jul 2001, Ronan Waide wrote:
This is so apropos emacs/xemacs... Anyway. I'll check the new
mail-extr with emacs 21 to see if the problems are fixed, and in the
meantime I have that nasty brute-force hack that I posted which
seems to be doing
On Sun, 1 Jul 2001, Ronan Waide wrote:
My options are
(1) reinvent the wheel, which is sort of what
bbdb-extract-address-components is doing at the moment;
(2) fix mail-extr and bundle the fixed version with BBDB, which is,
AFAIK, what used happen
(3) Use
Ronan Waide wrote:
I wouldn't think so - if a working mail-extr is all it takes, then
maybe I'll lift the emacs-21 copy and try bundling it into BBDB.
First, change its name, and the names of all the functions in it.
One day, this wonderful new mail-extr will be old and outdated, and
people
I'm looking at the rather trivial task of getting BBDB to properly
parse what I'll disparagingly refer to as Outlook-format names,
whereby my own moniker is rendered Waide, Ronan. The basic problem
is making sure that you also do the right thing with John Smith, Sr
- i.e. that it doesn't get
FWIW, mail-extr.el as of Emacs 21 has this comment:
/
| revision 1.25
| date: 1997/11/20 21:45:59; author: kwzh; state: Exp; lines: +714 -681
| (mail-extract-address-components):
| New arg ALL says return info about all the addresses.
| Clarify buffer switching logic using save-excursion.
On July 1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
| New arg ALL says return info about all the addresses.
| Clarify buffer switching logic using save-excursion.
Yes, this is in the emacs 20.7 version - the code, if not the
changelog comment. But it's broken as of 20.7. Perhaps they've fixed
it for 21.
On Sun, 1 Jul 2001, Ronan Waide wrote:
On July 1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
| New arg ALL says return info about all the addresses.
| Clarify buffer switching logic using save-excursion.
Yes, this is in the emacs 20.7 version - the code, if not the
changelog comment. But it's broken as of
On July 2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I wonder why one of the Johns disappeared. But I think it's because
mail-extract-address-components avoids redundancy. Putting John Foo
there rather than just John (but with the quotes, as before) produces
the right full name.
Yes, if you set
On July 2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Sun, 1 Jul 2001, Ronan Waide wrote:
On July 1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
| New arg ALL says return info about all the addresses.
| Clarify buffer switching logic using save-excursion.
Yes, this is in the emacs 20.7 version - the code, if not the
12 matches
Mail list logo
