I'd check for the function. Seems more robust. (E.g., if someone forks
an older version and updates the date string, or if the function is
renamed or removed in the future.) If there's a bug you need to check
for you can always complicate the guard later.
--Barak.
Barak A. Pearlmutter ba...@cs.nuim.ie writes:
I'd check for the function. Seems more robust. (E.g., if someone forks
an older version and updates the date string, or if the function is
renamed or removed in the future.) If there's a bug you need to check
for you can always complicate the
On Thu Jun 12 2014 Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote:
I'd check for the function. Seems more robust.
Agreed.
--
HPCC Systems Open Source Big Data Platform from LexisNexis Risk Solutions
Find What Matters Most in Your Big Data
(1) BBDB now allows arbitrary lisp expressions as values of
xfields. Interactively, you can call bbdb-insert-field or
bbdb-edit-field with a prefix arg for this. If the value of an
xfield is not a string, it is displayed using the same
pretty-printer used by describe-variable.
Roland Winkler wink...@gnu.org writes:
(1) BBDB now allows arbitrary lisp expressions as values of
xfields. Interactively, you can call bbdb-insert-field or
bbdb-edit-field with a prefix arg for this. If the value of an
xfield is not a string, it is displayed using the same
