Re: [PATCH] Function for copying field values

On Thu Sep 3 2015 Eric Abrahamsen wrote: > Basically it does what it says: if point is on a record name, the > whole record is copied, like before. If point is on a particular > field, the value (but not label) of that field is copied. I am just trying to understand a typical usage pattern for

Re: [PATCH] Function for copying field values

"Roland Winkler" writes: > On Sat Sep 5 2015 Roland Winkler wrote: >> On Thu Sep 3 2015 Eric Abrahamsen wrote: >> > Basically it does what it says: if point is on a record name, the >> > whole record is copied, like before. If point is on a particular >> > field, the value (but

Re: [PATCH] Function for copying field values

On Sat Sep 5 2015 Roland Winkler wrote: > On Thu Sep 3 2015 Eric Abrahamsen wrote: > > Basically it does what it says: if point is on a record name, the > > whole record is copied, like before. If point is on a particular > > field, the value (but not label) of that field is copied. > > I am just

[PATCH] Function for copying field values

I've always wanted a function for easily copying the values of record fields. The attached patch replaces the `bbdb-copy-records-as-kill' function with a new function, `bbdb-copy-records-or-fields-as-kill'. Basically it does what it says: if point is on a record name, the whole record is copied,