Henrik Enberg wrote:
> There seem to be a bug in related to `bbdb-canonicalize-net-hook'.
> I think that either the name or the behavior should be changed to
> reflect what works and what doesn't work.
This is an historical artifact. In the deep dark past, all `hook'
variables were just setq
There seem to be a bug in related to `bbdb-canonicalize-net-hook'. Given the
name I assumed it was a hook and tried the following code:
(add-hook 'bbdb-canonicalize-net-hook
'(lambda (addr)
(cond ((string-match "\\([^+]+\\)\\(\\+[^@]+\\)\\(@.*\\)\\'" addr)
