OK we are up to 7500. Can anybody beat that?
Don't get me wrong. I'd be happy to have 10,000 entries. It's just
the gunzipping time, loading time, and processing time that matter.
Oh, and maybe memory. For me on just about any Sparc, anything above
1000 is too much.
(Funny about the
I don't know why you get so upset. With the automatic addition of your
record, my BBDB is up to 7471 entries. The only thought about this that
has come to mind is that my computer needs more RAM.
I always do bbdb-changed before saving.
My bbdb has 2500+ entries (400K).
To make bbdb more useful,
I think we need a way to easily trade sets of entries with other people.
(Do you have any intelligence to report?)
Also, removing the bbdb from emacs and putting it into it's own process.
A net
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I always do bbdb-changed before saving.
My bbdb has 2500+ entries (400K).
sound of knuckles cracking 2584.
Every few months I do M-x bbdb-notes ^$ and nuke anyone who doesn't look
interesting. Yeah, it takes forever. Knowing how hard it would be to
speed it up has
Hi Folks,
My bbdb has grown quite a lot since I started to use it. So I would
like to delete some of the records in order to bring down its size.
Unfortunately doing it by hand is very slow. Ideas are welcome.
Now the task given above might have no good solution but I would like
to prepare
