Robert Widhopf-Fenk wrote:
> Are you paranoid, or are there any bugs I missed ? ;-)
Mostly I just cut'n'pasted from elsewhere :-)
> Your code should give you an error when a record has a
> "readonly" field as you are returning a string which is
> neither t nor a number. BTW (if "" t) will retur
On Monday, February 19, 2007 at 09:54:33, Len Trigg wrote:
> Robert Widhopf-Fenk wrote:
> > In CVS bbdb-quiet-about-name-mismatches can be a function or
> > sexp now in order to tweak handling of name mismatches.
> >
> > This is not as mighty as modifying bbdb-readonly-p would be,
> > but it is me
Len Trigg wrote:
> > Robert Widhopf-Fenk wrote:
> > > No, but maybe you just want to ignore the messages which go
> > > to the mailing list.
>
> I tried setting things up this way and, it doesn't work for me.
>
> I have bbdb/mail-auto-create-p and bbdb/news-auto-create-p both set to
> nil, so
Robert Widhopf-Fenk wrote:
> In CVS bbdb-quiet-about-name-mismatches can be a function or
> sexp now in order to tweak handling of name mismatches.
>
> This is not as mighty as modifying bbdb-readonly-p would be,
> but it is meant for what Len originally wanted.
Works a treat. My bbdb-quiet-abou
On Wednesday, February 14, 2007 at 08:16:44, Patrick Campbell-Preston
wrote:
>
> Len Trigg wrote:
>
> > > Robert Widhopf-Fenk wrote:
> > > > No, but maybe you just want to ignore the messages which go
> > > > to the mailing list.
> >
> > I tried setting things up this way and, it doesn't work fo
On 14 Feb 2007, Len Trigg told this:
> * Allow bbdb-readonly-p to be a function that takes a record as a
> parameter, e.g.
This seems the most Lispish and most generic of approaches. (You'll
still want to allow it to be t-or-nil as well, of course.)
You'll need to do some extra work, because ma
Nix wrote:
> On 13 Feb 2007, Len Trigg told this:
> > I had a bit of a hack and this is what I came up with (bits were
> > copied from the beginning of bbdb-annotate-message-sender). Basically
> > it sets bbdb-readonly-p to true if there's a field called readonly
> > associated with the record (if
On 13 Feb 2007, Len Trigg told this:
> I had a bit of a hack and this is what I came up with (bits were
> copied from the beginning of bbdb-annotate-message-sender). Basically
> it sets bbdb-readonly-p to true if there's a field called readonly
> associated with the record (if any). Please show m
Len Trigg wrote:
> Robert Widhopf-Fenk wrote:
> > No, but maybe you just want to ignore the messages which go
> > to the mailing list.
I tried setting things up this way and, it doesn't work for me.
I have bbdb/mail-auto-create-p and bbdb/news-auto-create-p both set to
nil, so that new bbdb rec
Robert Widhopf-Fenk wrote:
> On Monday, February 12, 2007 at 09:40:13, Len Trigg wrote:
> > I would like to add a bbdb field to these records (e.g. fixed-name),
> > and tell Wanderlust/BBDB to never update the name/AKA for those
> > records. Does anybody have a lisp snippet that accomplishes this?
On Monday, February 12, 2007 at 09:40:13, Len Trigg wrote:
>
> While there's a bit of Wanderlust/BBDB activity I'll get in with a
> question I've been meaning to ask. Here's the problem. I have
> Wanderlust happily passing messages to BBDB update BBDB
> records. However for mailing list addresse
While there's a bit of Wanderlust/BBDB activity I'll get in with a
question I've been meaning to ask. Here's the problem. I have
Wanderlust happily passing messages to BBDB update BBDB records.
However for mailing list addresses, nearly every sender has a
different name associated with the addre
12 matches
Mail list logo
