> On 4 Apr 95, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert P. Goldman) wrote:
goldman> Thanks for the tip, but actually, it isn't quite right --- since I
goldman> am in the states, by and large I want to use North American phone
goldman> numbers. But when I'm editing a NON-NA phone number, I don't want
While we're talking about phone numbers. I assume someone's already
patched the north-american phone number algorithm to allow the new
areacodes (they don't have 0 or 1 in the second digit). If so, please
post. If not, I'll take a look at it "sometime".
I think only Western Washington and Al
> "GG" == Graham Gough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
GG> (setq bbdb-north-american-phone-numbers-p nil)
Thanks for the tip, but actually, it isn't quite right --- since I am
in the states, by and large I want to use North American phone
numbers. But when I'm editing a NON-NA phone number, I d
I was using bbdb-copy-record to create a new record based on an old
record for someone in Australia. I found when editing the phone
numbers that the phone numbers in the old record were rejected as
unparseable and bbdb would accept only US-format phone numbers.
If I get a chance, I will try to
